Centre for Health Behaviours Research, School of Public Health and Primary Care Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
BMC Public Health. 2010 May 6;10:232. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-232.
Increasingly more men who have sex with men (MSM) are using the internet to seek sex partners, and many HIV-related studies targeting MSM collect data from gay venues in order to inform the design of prevention programs. However, internet-based MSM may have different HIV risk behaviors and associated factors from those attending venues. This study examined differences in risk behaviors and socio-cultural profiles between MSM recruited from venues (e.g., gay bars/saunas) and from the internet respectively.
An anonymous cross-sectional survey was conducted. A total of 566 Chinese MSM (340 recruited from gay-venues and 226 recruited from the internet) who self-reported having had anal or oral sex with another man in the last 12 months completed a structured questionnaire.
Internet-based MSM were more likely than venue-based MSM to have engaged in unprotected anal intercourse (53.3% vs. 33.8%) or commercial sex (as clients: 12.8% vs. 5.3%; as sex workers: 6.2% vs. 1.5%), to have sought MSM partners from the internet (51.3% vs. 20.9%), and to have contracted sexually transmitted diseases (STD) in the last 12 months (4.4% vs. 0.3%). On the other hand, internet-based MSM were less likely to have multiple sex partners (58.4% vs. 75.6%) and to have used psychoactive substances (7.1% vs. 15.6%) or drunk alcohol before sex (8.8% vs. 16.2%). Moreover, internet-based MSM reported poor acceptance of their own sexual orientation, felt more discriminated against, and received less social support than venue-recruited MSM.
Significant differences were observed between the two groups of MSM. Segmentation and targeted interventions are recommended when designing preventive interventions.
越来越多的男男性行为者(MSM)利用互联网寻找性伴侣,许多针对 MSM 的艾滋病毒相关研究都是从男同性恋场所收集数据,以便为预防规划提供信息。然而,基于互联网的 MSM 与那些参加场所的 MSM 可能具有不同的艾滋病毒风险行为和相关因素。本研究分别检查了从场所(如男同性恋酒吧/桑拿浴室)和从互联网招募的 MSM 之间的风险行为和社会文化特征的差异。
进行了一项匿名的横断面调查。共有 566 名中国 MSM(340 名从男同性恋场所招募,226 名从互联网招募),他们自我报告在过去 12 个月内与另一名男性发生过肛门或口交,完成了一份结构化问卷。
与基于场所的 MSM 相比,基于互联网的 MSM 更有可能进行无保护的肛交(53.3%比 33.8%)或商业性(作为客户:12.8%比 5.3%;作为性工作者:6.2%比 1.5%),更有可能从互联网上寻找 MSM 伴侣(51.3%比 20.9%),并且在过去 12 个月内感染性传播疾病(STD)(4.4%比 0.3%)。另一方面,基于互联网的 MSM 更不可能有多个性伴侣(58.4%比 75.6%),也更不可能在性行为前使用精神活性物质(7.1%比 15.6%)或饮酒(8.8%比 16.2%)。此外,与从场所招募的 MSM 相比,基于互联网的 MSM 对自己的性取向接受程度较差,感到受到更多歧视,获得的社会支持也较少。
在这两组 MSM 之间观察到了显著的差异。在设计预防干预措施时,建议进行细分和有针对性的干预。