Paediatric Oncology Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
J Neurooncol. 2013 May;113(1):127-34. doi: 10.1007/s11060-013-1098-2. Epub 2013 Mar 4.
A multicenter, two stage phase II study, investigated irinotecan plus temozolomide in children with newly diagnosed high grade glioma. The primary endpoint was tumor response during a two-cycle treatment window, confirmed by external review committee. Patients received oral temozolomide 100 mg/(m(2) day) (days 1-5) and intravenous irinotecan 10 mg/(m(2) day) (days 1-5 and 8-12) for two 21-day cycles (three cycles for patients exhibiting objective tumor response). Standard treatment was then administered according to local investigator choice. In total 17 patients were enrolled and treated by local investigators. However, central pathology review found three patients did not have a diagnosis of high grade glioma and another four patients did not have evaluable disease according to independent central radiological review. The primary endpoint was based on the first ten evaluable patients as determined by the external review committee. Recruitment was stopped for futility after there were no complete or partial responses during the two-cycle treatment window in the first ten evaluable patients. Five patients had stable disease, and five progressed. Data for secondary endpoints including; time to tumor progression, time to treatment failure, and overall survival is reported. The safety profile of the treatment showed the combination was tolerable with two patients (11.8 %) having grade three nausea, and one (5.9 %) experiencing a grade four neutropenia, leading to permanent discontinuation from adjuvant treatment. Irinotecan plus temozolomide, although well tolerated did not improve outcome over historical controls in this setting.
一项多中心、两阶段 II 期研究,调查了伊立替康联合替莫唑胺在新诊断的高级别神经胶质瘤儿童中的应用。主要终点是外部审查委员会确认的两周期治疗窗口期间的肿瘤反应。患者接受口服替莫唑胺 100mg/(m2 天)(第 1-5 天)和静脉注射伊立替康 10mg/(m2 天)(第 1-5 天和 8-12 天),每 21 天为一个周期(对表现出客观肿瘤反应的患者进行三个周期)。然后根据当地研究者的选择进行标准治疗。共有 17 名患者被纳入并由当地研究者治疗。然而,中心病理学审查发现,根据独立的中心放射学审查,有 3 名患者没有高级别神经胶质瘤的诊断,另有 4 名患者没有可评估的疾病。主要终点是根据外部审查委员会确定的前 10 名可评估患者得出的。在第一个 10 名可评估患者的两周期治疗窗口内没有完全或部分反应后,因无效而停止了招募。5 名患者病情稳定,5 名患者病情进展。报告了次要终点包括肿瘤进展时间、治疗失败时间和总生存的数据。该治疗的安全性特征表明,该联合治疗耐受良好,有 2 名患者(11.8%)出现 3 级恶心,1 名患者(5.9%)出现 4 级中性粒细胞减少症,导致永久性停止辅助治疗。在这种情况下,伊立替康联合替莫唑胺虽然耐受良好,但并没有改善该人群的预后。