Grundmann R T
In den Grüben 144, Burghausen, Germany.
Zentralbl Chir. 2013 Apr;138(2):210-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1327964. Epub 2013 Mar 4.
This overview comments on gender-specific differences in prevalence, treatment and outcome in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD), carotid stenosis, and abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA).
For the literature review, the Medline database (PubMed) was searched under the key words "peripheral arterial disease AND gender", "carotid stenosis AND gender" and "abdominal aortic aneurysm AND gender".
1.) Women (preferably black women) with PAD experience rather than men bypass failure or amputation. Nevertheless, gender should not constitute a selection criterion for revascularisation therapy. Despite an older age and more advanced stages of disease in women, infrainguinal arterial reconstructions could achieve, in published series, patency and limb salvage rates which did not differ from those of men. 2.) The benefit of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis is less for women compared with men. However, registries exhibited at best for symptomatic women an increased perioperative risk of CEA compared with men, with CEA especially in women better than carotid artery stenting. The treatment of AAA shows significant gender differences. The risk of rupture for small aneurysms is significantly greater in women compared with men, and they have higher in-hospital mortality rates for both open and endovascular repair of ruptured and intact AAA. Yet women also benefit from endovascular repair of AAA compared to open repair, although their eligibility for endovascular repair is less than that of men due to anatomic conditions.
As a rule, for the mentioned diseases less favourable results were reported in women. This may reflect biological disparities, or the differences are based on the fact that women develop arteriosclerotic changes later in life, requiring treatment in older age, with more advanced disease, and with higher comorbidity than men. In addition gender-related differences in the use of secondary medical prevention of PAD have been described. Future studies on the potential impact of gender on the results of vascular surgery are needed.
本综述评论了外周动脉疾病(PAD)、颈动脉狭窄和腹主动脉瘤(AAA)患者在患病率、治疗和预后方面的性别差异。
为进行文献综述,在Medline数据库(PubMed)中以“外周动脉疾病与性别”、“颈动脉狭窄与性别”以及“腹主动脉瘤与性别”为关键词进行检索。
1.)患有PAD的女性(尤其是黑人女性)比男性更容易出现搭桥失败或截肢。然而,性别不应成为血管重建治疗的选择标准。尽管女性年龄较大且疾病阶段更 advanced,但在已发表的系列研究中,股动脉以下动脉重建术的通畅率和肢体挽救率与男性并无差异。2.)与男性相比,女性从无症状颈动脉狭窄的颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)中获益较少。然而,登记数据显示,有症状的女性CEA围手术期风险至多比男性增加,尤其是女性的CEA优于颈动脉支架置入术。AAA的治疗存在显著的性别差异。与男性相比,小动脉瘤女性破裂风险显著更高,并且在破裂和未破裂AAA的开放和血管腔内修复中,她们的住院死亡率更高。然而,与开放修复相比,女性也从AAA的血管腔内修复中获益,尽管由于解剖条件,她们进行血管腔内修复的资格低于男性。
通常,对于上述疾病,女性的结果报告较差。这可能反映了生物学差异,或者差异基于女性在生命后期出现动脉硬化变化,需要在老年时进行治疗,疾病更 advanced,合并症比男性更多这一事实。此外,还描述了PAD二级医疗预防使用方面的性别相关差异。需要进一步研究性别对血管手术结果的潜在影响。