Environmental Health Group, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, WC1E 7HT, London, UK.
Acta Trop. 2013 Jun;126(3):265-8. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2013.02.018. Epub 2013 Mar 4.
The Kato-Katz, conventional ethyl-acetate sedimentation, and Midi Parasep(®) methods for diagnosing infection with soil-transmitted helminths were compared. The Kato-Katz technique gave the best overall diagnostic performance with the highest results in all measures (prevalence, faecal egg count, sensitivity) followed by the conventional ethyl-acetate and then the Midi Parasep(®) technique. The Kato-Katz technique showed a significantly higher faecal egg count and sensitivity for both hookworm and Trichuris as compared to the Midi Parasep(®) technique. The conventional ethyl-acetate technique produced smaller pellets and showed lower pellet mobility as compared to the Midi Parasep(®).
本研究比较了加藤厚涂片法、常规乙酸乙酯沉淀法和 Midi Parasep(®)法检测土壤传播性蠕虫感染的效果。结果表明,加藤厚涂片法在所有检测指标(包括感染率、粪便卵计数、敏感性)中均表现出最佳的诊断性能,其次是常规乙酸乙酯沉淀法,然后是 Midi Parasep(®)法。与 Midi Parasep(®)法相比,加藤厚涂片法检测钩虫和鞭虫的粪便卵计数和敏感性显著更高。与 Midi Parasep(®)法相比,常规乙酸乙酯沉淀法产生的粪样颗粒更小,移动性也更低。