Suppr超能文献

确定变异性的决定因素以调整阿司匹林治疗方案。

Identifying determinants of variability to tailor aspirin therapy.

作者信息

Rocca Bianca, Dragani Alfredo, Pagliaccia Francesca

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology, Catholic University School of Medicine, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2013 Mar;11(3):365-79. doi: 10.1586/erc.12.144.

Abstract

Once-daily, low-dose aspirin is a cornerstone in the prophylaxis and treatment of cardiovascular diseases. Aspirin 'resistance' still lacks definition, a standardized reference assay, underlying mechanisms, clinical impact or efficacy of alternative antiplatelet drugs. Aspirin response in several studies has been measured by different platelet function tests, not always reflecting aspirin pharmacodynamics, thus generating significantly heterogeneous results. The EMA indicated serum thromboxane B2 as the only valid surrogate assay to study different aspirin formulations. Rather than resistance, recent studies focused on sources of intra- and inter-individual variability in response to aspirin, based on pharmacokinetic and/or pharmacodynamic mechanisms. Drug interactions, diabetes, conditions of increased platelet output, obesity and aging can potentially increase the variability of aspirin response. Preliminary studies testing different aspirin regimens showed that twice-daily low doses were more effective than once-daily higher aspirin doses on surrogate end points of platelet inhibition. Large studies are needed to test new disease-tailored, low-dose aspirin regimens.

摘要

每日一次的低剂量阿司匹林是心血管疾病预防和治疗的基石。阿司匹林“抵抗”仍缺乏定义、标准化参考检测方法、潜在机制、临床影响或替代抗血小板药物的疗效。在多项研究中,阿司匹林反应是通过不同的血小板功能测试来测量的,这些测试并不总是反映阿司匹林的药效学,因此产生了显著异质的结果。欧洲药品管理局指出,血清血栓素B2是研究不同阿司匹林制剂的唯一有效替代检测方法。近期研究并非关注阿司匹林抵抗,而是基于药代动力学和/或药效学机制,聚焦于个体内和个体间阿司匹林反应变异性的来源。药物相互作用、糖尿病、血小板生成增加的情况、肥胖和衰老都可能增加阿司匹林反应的变异性。测试不同阿司匹林给药方案的初步研究表明,每日两次低剂量在血小板抑制替代终点方面比每日一次高剂量阿司匹林更有效。需要开展大型研究来测试新的针对疾病的低剂量阿司匹林给药方案。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验