Division of Prevention and Community Research, Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, 389 Whitney Avenue, New Haven, CT 06517, USA.
Am J Health Promot. 2013 Sep-Oct;28(1):50-8. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.120419-QUAN-207.2. Epub 2013 Mar 7.
Examine the effects of a comprehensive, school-wide social-emotional and character development program using a positive youth development perspective. Specifically, we examined a mediation mechanism whereby positive academic-related behaviors mediated the intervention effects on substance use, violence, and sexual activity.
Matched-pair, cluster-randomized, controlled design.
Twenty (10 intervention and 10 control) racially/ethnically diverse schools in Hawaii.
Elementary-aged students (N = 1784) from grade 5.
The Positive Action program.
Students self-reported their academic behaviors, together with their substance use, violence, and voluntary sexual activity; teachers rated students' academic behaviors, substance use, and violence.
Structural equation modeling.
Students attending intervention schools reported significantly better academic behavior (B = .273, SE = .039, p < .001) and significantly less substance use (B = -.970, SE = .292, p < .01, incidence-rate ratio [IRR] = .379), violence (B = -1.410, SE = .296, p < .001, IRR = .244), and sexual activity (B = -2.415, SE = .608, p < .001, odds ratio = .089); boys reported more negative behaviors than girls. Intervention effects on student-reported substance use, violence, and sexual activity were mediated by positive academic behavior. Teacher reports corroborated these results, with rated academic behavior partially mediating the effects of the intervention on rated negative behaviors.
This study (1) provides evidence that adds insight into one mechanism through which a social-emotional and character development program affects negative outcomes and (2) supports social-emotional and character development and positive youth development perspectives that posit that focusing on youths' assets may reduce negative behaviors.
从积极的青年发展角度考察综合的、全校范围的社会情感和品格发展计划的效果。具体而言,我们考察了一个中介机制,即积极的与学业相关的行为在干预对物质使用、暴力和性行为的影响中起中介作用。
配对、聚类随机对照设计。
夏威夷 20 所(10 所干预学校和 10 所对照学校)不同种族/民族的学校。
五年级的学龄儿童(N=1784)。
积极行动计划。
学生自我报告他们的学业行为,以及他们的物质使用、暴力和自愿性行为;教师对学生的学业行为、物质使用和暴力进行评价。
结构方程模型。
参加干预学校的学生报告了明显更好的学业行为(B=0.273,SE=0.039,p<0.001)和明显更少的物质使用(B=-0.970,SE=0.292,p<0.01,发病率比[IRR]=0.379)、暴力(B=-1.410,SE=0.296,p<0.001,IRR=0.244)和性行为(B=-2.415,SE=0.608,p<0.001,优势比=0.089);男孩比女孩报告了更多的负面行为。学生报告的物质使用、暴力和性行为的干预效果由积极的学业行为中介。教师报告证实了这些结果,被评定的学业行为部分中介了干预对被评定的负面行为的影响。
本研究(1)提供了证据,深入了解了社会情感和品格发展计划影响负面结果的一种机制;(2)支持社会情感和品格发展以及积极的青年发展观点,即关注年轻人的资产可能会减少负面行为。