I.R.C.C.S. Regional Cancer Hospital C.R.O.B., 85028 Rionero-in-Vulture, PZ, Italy.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2013 Mar 4;14(2):4075. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v14i2.4075.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the applicator-guided volumetric-modulated arc therapy (AGVMAT) solution as an alternative to high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BRT) treatment of the vaginal vault in patients with gynecological cancer (GC). AGVMAT plans for 51 women were developed. The volumetric scans used for plans were obtained with an implanted CT-compatible vaginal cylinder which provides spatial registration and immobilization of the gynecologic organs. Dosimetric and radiobiological comparisons for planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OARs) were performed by means of a dose-volume histogram (DVH), equivalent uniform dose (EUD), and local tumor control probability (LTCP). In addition, the integral dose and the overall delivery time, were evaluated. The HDR-BRT averages of EUD and minimum LTCP were significantly higher than those of AGVMAT. Doses for the OARs were comparable for the bladder and sigmoid, while, although HDR-BRT was able to better spare the bowel, AGVMAT provided a significant reduction of d2cc, d1cc, and dmax (p < 0.01) for the rectum. AGVMAT integral doses were higher than HDR-BRT with low values in both cases. Delivery times were about two or three times higher for HDR-BRT with respect to the single arc technique (AGVMAT1) and dual arc technique (AGVMAT2), respectively. The applicator-guided volumetric-modulated arc therapy seems to have the potential of improving rectum avoidance. However, brachytherapy improves performance in terms of PTV coverage, as demonstrated by a greater EUD and better LTCP curves.
本研究旨在评估施源器引导的容积调强弧形治疗(AGVMAT)方案作为一种替代高剂量率近距离治疗(HDR-BRT)治疗妇科癌症(GC)患者阴道穹窿的方法。为 51 名女性制定了 AGVMAT 计划。用于计划的容积扫描是使用植入的 CT 兼容阴道圆筒获得的,该圆筒提供了妇科器官的空间配准和固定。通过剂量-体积直方图(DVH)、等效均匀剂量(EUD)和局部肿瘤控制概率(LTCP)对计划靶区(PTV)和危及器官(OARs)进行了剂量学和放射生物学比较。此外,还评估了积分剂量和总治疗时间。HDR-BRT 的 EUD 和最小 LTCP 平均值明显高于 AGVMAT。膀胱和乙状结肠的 OAR 剂量相当,而虽然 HDR-BRT 能够更好地保护肠道,但 AGVMAT 显著降低了直肠的 d2cc、d1cc 和 dmax(p < 0.01)。AGVMAT 的积分剂量高于 HDR-BRT,两种情况下的剂量都较低。与单次弧形技术(AGVMAT1)和双弧形技术(AGVMAT2)相比,HDR-BRT 的治疗时间分别高出约两倍和三倍。施源器引导的容积调强弧形治疗似乎有改善直肠避免的潜力。然而,近距离治疗在 PTV 覆盖方面表现更好,表现为更大的 EUD 和更好的 LTCP 曲线。