Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic and Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013 Oct;22(10):1413-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.01.005. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
This study evaluates the intrarater and inter-rater reliability of 3-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) measurements of component position and alignment after total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA).
Two patients and one whole-body cadaver with anatomic TSA implants underwent CT scans of the shoulder with a 0.6-mm slice thickness in two different arm positions (supine arm down or lateral decubitus arm up) on the same day. Test-retest reliability of component measurements within and between 5 observers was determined, as were any differences in measurements based on arm position. Precision and 95% confidence intervals were determined for the following measurements: glenoid component position (anterior-posterior, superior-inferior, and medial-lateral), glenoid component orientation (version, inclination, and roll), and humeral-glenoid alignment (HGA). HGA was defined in the anterior-posterior and superior-inferior dimensions.
The range of precision for measurement of the position of the glenoid implant across observers was between 0.2 and 0.5 mm, and for orientation, it was between 1.2° and 1.5°. The range of precision for measurement of HGA across observers was between 0.7 and 1.2 mm. There was no significant difference in the precision of measurements between the two imaged arm positions.
The described method of 3-dimensional CT imaging can provide very precise and reproducible assessment of component position after TSA. Ultimately, correlation of these measurements with clinical outcome, anatomic factors, prosthetic design, and surgical factors will allow for better understanding of the causes of implant failure.
本研究评估了全肩关节置换(TSA)后三维(3D)计算机断层扫描(CT)测量关节盂组件位置和对线的组内和组间可靠性。
两名患者和一具全身解剖 TSA 植入物尸体在同一天接受了肩部 CT 扫描,使用 0.6 毫米切片厚度,手臂处于两种不同位置(仰卧位手臂放下或侧卧位手臂抬起)。在 5 名观察者内部和之间确定了组件测量的测试-再测试可靠性,以及基于手臂位置的任何测量差异。确定了以下测量的精度和 95%置信区间:关节盂组件位置(前后、上下和内外)、关节盂组件方向(位置、倾斜和滚动)以及肱骨头-关节盂对齐(HGA)。HGA 在前后和上下维度上定义。
观察者之间关节盂植入物位置测量的精度范围为 0.2 至 0.5 毫米,而方向的精度范围为 1.2°至 1.5°。观察者之间 HGA 测量的精度范围为 0.7 至 1.2 毫米。两种成像手臂位置之间的测量精度没有显著差异。
所描述的 3D CT 成像方法可以非常精确和可重复地评估 TSA 后关节盂组件的位置。最终,这些测量结果与临床结果、解剖因素、假体设计和手术因素的相关性将有助于更好地理解植入物失败的原因。