Suppr超能文献

全肩关节置换术后肩盂解剖结构和关系的放射影像学测量的准确性和可靠性。

Accuracy and reliability of postoperative radiographic measurements of glenoid anatomy and relationships in patients with total shoulder arthroplasty.

机构信息

Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.

出版信息

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013 Aug;22(8):1068-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2012.11.015. Epub 2013 Feb 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Radiographic imaging is the follow-up imaging modality most widely used for patients who have undergone total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). However, its accuracy of measurement of component position has not been validated against a gold standard in a clinical series.

METHODS

Thirty-two x-ray images and computed tomography scans were taken within 1 month of each other in patients who had undergone TSA with an all-polyethylene glenoid component. The humeral glenoid alignment in the coronal superior-inferior (SI) plane (HGA-SI), humeral glenoid alignment in the axial anterior-posterior (AP) plane (HGA-AP), and humeral scapular alignment in the axial plane (HSA-AP) were measured with 21 pairs of images, and glenoid component retroversion was measured with all 32 pairs. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated for HGA-SI, HGA-AP, HSA-AP, and version, and accuracy analysis criteria of the radiographs were assessed using predetermined criterion.

RESULTS

We found fair-moderate agreement between x-ray images and CT scans for HGA-SI (ICC = 0.42) and version (ICC = 0.69), but poor agreement for HGA-AP (ICC = 0.04) and HSA-AP (ICC = 0.38). An average difference of overestimating HGA-SI by 0.06% ± 7.7%, with a precision 95% confidence interval of 7.6%, and overestimating version by -4.2° ± 5.1°, with a precision 95% confidence interval of 9.9°, was found.

CONCLUSION

This validation study has defined the ability and limitation for these measurements using high-quality axillary and AP radiographs.

摘要

背景

放射影像学是接受全聚乙烯肩胛盂假体全肩关节置换术(TSA)的患者最广泛使用的后续影像学检查方法。然而,在临床系列中,其对假体位置的测量准确性尚未经过金标准验证。

方法

在接受全聚乙烯肩胛盂假体 TSA 的患者中,在 1 个月内进行了 32 次 X 射线图像和计算机断层扫描检查。在冠状位上下(SI)平面上测量肱骨肩胛盂的对准(HGA-SI)、在轴向前后(AP)平面上测量肱骨肩胛盂的对准(HGA-AP)和在轴向平面上测量肱骨肩胛盂的对准(HSA-AP),并用 21 对图像测量肩胛盂假体后倾,并对所有 32 对图像进行测量。计算了 HGA-SI、HGA-AP、HSA-AP 和版本的组内相关系数(ICC),并使用预定标准评估了 X 射线的准确性分析标准。

结果

我们发现 X 射线图像和 CT 扫描在 HGA-SI(ICC=0.42)和版本(ICC=0.69)方面具有中等至良好的一致性,但在 HGA-AP(ICC=0.04)和 HSA-AP(ICC=0.38)方面一致性较差。我们发现,HGA-SI 平均高估了 0.06%±7.7%,95%置信区间精度为 7.6%,而版本平均高估了-4.2°±5.1°,95%置信区间精度为 9.9%。

结论

这项验证研究使用高质量的腋位和 AP 射线照片定义了这些测量的能力和局限性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验