Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013 Aug;22(8):1068-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2012.11.015. Epub 2013 Feb 1.
Radiographic imaging is the follow-up imaging modality most widely used for patients who have undergone total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). However, its accuracy of measurement of component position has not been validated against a gold standard in a clinical series.
Thirty-two x-ray images and computed tomography scans were taken within 1 month of each other in patients who had undergone TSA with an all-polyethylene glenoid component. The humeral glenoid alignment in the coronal superior-inferior (SI) plane (HGA-SI), humeral glenoid alignment in the axial anterior-posterior (AP) plane (HGA-AP), and humeral scapular alignment in the axial plane (HSA-AP) were measured with 21 pairs of images, and glenoid component retroversion was measured with all 32 pairs. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated for HGA-SI, HGA-AP, HSA-AP, and version, and accuracy analysis criteria of the radiographs were assessed using predetermined criterion.
We found fair-moderate agreement between x-ray images and CT scans for HGA-SI (ICC = 0.42) and version (ICC = 0.69), but poor agreement for HGA-AP (ICC = 0.04) and HSA-AP (ICC = 0.38). An average difference of overestimating HGA-SI by 0.06% ± 7.7%, with a precision 95% confidence interval of 7.6%, and overestimating version by -4.2° ± 5.1°, with a precision 95% confidence interval of 9.9°, was found.
This validation study has defined the ability and limitation for these measurements using high-quality axillary and AP radiographs.
放射影像学是接受全聚乙烯肩胛盂假体全肩关节置换术(TSA)的患者最广泛使用的后续影像学检查方法。然而,在临床系列中,其对假体位置的测量准确性尚未经过金标准验证。
在接受全聚乙烯肩胛盂假体 TSA 的患者中,在 1 个月内进行了 32 次 X 射线图像和计算机断层扫描检查。在冠状位上下(SI)平面上测量肱骨肩胛盂的对准(HGA-SI)、在轴向前后(AP)平面上测量肱骨肩胛盂的对准(HGA-AP)和在轴向平面上测量肱骨肩胛盂的对准(HSA-AP),并用 21 对图像测量肩胛盂假体后倾,并对所有 32 对图像进行测量。计算了 HGA-SI、HGA-AP、HSA-AP 和版本的组内相关系数(ICC),并使用预定标准评估了 X 射线的准确性分析标准。
我们发现 X 射线图像和 CT 扫描在 HGA-SI(ICC=0.42)和版本(ICC=0.69)方面具有中等至良好的一致性,但在 HGA-AP(ICC=0.04)和 HSA-AP(ICC=0.38)方面一致性较差。我们发现,HGA-SI 平均高估了 0.06%±7.7%,95%置信区间精度为 7.6%,而版本平均高估了-4.2°±5.1°,95%置信区间精度为 9.9%。
这项验证研究使用高质量的腋位和 AP 射线照片定义了这些测量的能力和局限性。