Suppr超能文献

基于 DSM-IV-TR 标准的现患或既往(轻躁狂)发作筛查问卷的编制和验证。

Development and validation of a screening questionnaire for present or past (hypo)manic episodes based on DSM-IV-TR criteria.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, North 15, West 7, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-8638, Japan.

出版信息

J Affect Disord. 2013 Sep 5;150(2):546-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2013.01.034. Epub 2013 Mar 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We developed a self-reported questionnaire, the Manic Episode Screening Questionnaire (MES), based on the eight diagnostic criteria items of DSM-IV-TR (hypo)manic episodes. This study was designed to determine the optimal screening methods to identify bipolar disorders among mood disorder patients of a psychiatric specialty clinic.

METHODS

In 95 mood disorder patients, we assessed the operational characteristics of the MES as a screening and diagnostic instrument using a DSM-IV-TR diagnosis by a trained psychiatrist as a reference standard. The reference criteria were bipolar disorders. MES was used with two methods: the diagnostic algorithm and the one-question method (question #1 only). The diagnostic algorithm was regarded as fulfilled if the answers to question #1 and three or more of questions #2 to #8 were "yes", corresponding to the DSM-IV-TR (hypo)manic episode criteria. In different subjects, the test-retest reliability of the MES was examined.

RESULTS

The two methods of the MES showed high specificity (0.93-0.94), high positive predictive value (0.81-0.83) and high negative predictive value (0.88-0.90), but the sensitivity scored lower (0.68-0.75). The test-retest reliability was moderate: 0.75 for the diagnostic algorithm and 0.68 for the one-question method.

LIMITATIONS

This study includes a small number of bipolar I patients. The findings might not be generalized to patients outside of this patient population.

CONCLUSIONS

The MES is useful for the screening and diagnosis of bipolar disorders among mood disorder patients in psychiatric specialty clinics. The one-question method of the MES is more convenient to use than prior questionnaires and is here recommended.

摘要

背景

我们基于 DSM-IV-TR(轻躁狂)发作的八项诊断标准项目,开发了一种自我报告问卷,即躁狂发作筛查问卷(MES)。本研究旨在确定最佳的筛查方法,以识别精神科专科诊所中情绪障碍患者的双相情感障碍。

方法

在 95 名情绪障碍患者中,我们使用经过培训的精神科医生的 DSM-IV-TR 诊断作为参考标准,评估了 MES 作为筛查和诊断工具的操作特性。参考标准为双相情感障碍。MES 采用两种方法:诊断算法和单问题方法(仅问题 #1)。如果问题 #1 和问题 #2 至 #8 的三个或更多问题的答案为“是”,则诊断算法被视为满足,这对应于 DSM-IV-TR(轻躁狂)发作标准。在不同的受试者中,还检查了 MES 的测试-重测信度。

结果

MES 的两种方法均显示出高特异性(0.93-0.94)、高阳性预测值(0.81-0.83)和高阴性预测值(0.88-0.90),但灵敏度较低(0.68-0.75)。测试-重测信度中等:诊断算法为 0.75,单问题方法为 0.68。

局限性

本研究纳入的双相 I 型患者数量较少。研究结果可能不适用于该患者人群之外的患者。

结论

MES 可用于精神科专科诊所中情绪障碍患者的双相情感障碍的筛查和诊断。MES 的单问题方法比之前的问卷更方便使用,在此推荐使用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验