Suppr超能文献

纽约州不同种族群体获得和使用非住院服务的情况。

Access to and use of non-inpatient services in New York State among racial-ethnic groups.

机构信息

Statistics and ServicesResearch Division, Nathan S. Kline Institute, 140 Old Orangeburg Rd., Orangeburg, NY 10962, USA.

出版信息

Psychiatr Serv. 2013 Feb 1;64(2):156-64. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201200098.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Nationwide studies contrasting service use of racial-ethnic groups provide an overview of disparities, but because of variation in populations and service systems, local studies are required to identify specific targets for remedial action. The authors report on the use of non-inpatient services regulated in New York State (NYS) and report use by the state's larger cultural groups. METHODS Data from the NYS Patient Characteristics Survey were used to estimate annual treated prevalence and treatment intensity, defined as the average number of annual weeks in service for non-Hispanic blacks, Hispanics, Asians, and non-Hispanic whites. The latter rates were obtained for specific types of treatment use, by person's age and diagnosis, for the state and for population density-defined regions. Statistical methods contrasted rates of whites with other groups. RESULTS A total of 578,496 individuals in these racial-ethnic groups were served in 2,500 programs, and 51% of those served were nonwhite. Treated prevalence rates of whites were lower than those of blacks and Hispanics and were substantially higher than prevalence rates for Asians. Statewide treatment intensity rates of all racial-ethnic and age groups were comparable except for lower use among Asians >65. Key findings from granular analyses were lower treatment intensity rates for black youths with disruptive disorders, Hispanic adults with anxiety disorders, and Asians >65 with depression compared with white counterparts. In upstate metropolitan areas, black youths and Hispanic adults received services in fewer weeks than whites, and in the New York City metropolitan area, whites >65 had higher treatment intensity rates than contrast groups. CONCLUSIONS Findings suggest a need for assistance to black families in negotiating the multiple systems used by their children, clinical training focusing on cultural symptom presentation, screening of Asians in community settings, and mandated cultural competency assessments for all programs.

摘要

目的

对比不同种族-民族群体服务使用情况的全国性研究提供了差异概览,但由于人群和服务系统的差异,需要进行本地研究以确定补救行动的具体目标。作者报告了纽约州(NYS)监管的非住院服务的使用情况,并报告了该州较大文化群体的使用情况。

方法

使用 NYS 患者特征调查的数据来估计每年治疗的流行率和治疗强度,定义为非西班牙裔黑人、西班牙裔、亚洲人和非西班牙裔白人每年接受服务的平均周数。通过特定类型的治疗使用,按人的年龄和诊断,获得了针对该州和人口密度定义区域的白人以及其他群体的特定治疗强度比率。统计方法对比了白人和其他群体的比率。

结果

在 2500 个项目中为这些种族-民族群体的 578496 人提供了服务,其中 51%的服务对象是非白人。白人的治疗流行率低于黑人西班牙裔,远高于亚洲人的流行率。除了 65 岁以上的亚洲人使用率较低外,所有种族-民族和年龄组的全州治疗强度比率相当。来自细粒度分析的主要发现是,与白人相比,患有破坏性行为障碍的黑人青年、患有焦虑症的西班牙裔成年人以及 65 岁以上的亚洲人治疗强度较低。在上州大都市区,黑人和西班牙裔成年人接受的治疗周数少于白人,而在纽约市大都市区,65 岁以上的白人治疗强度比率高于对照组。

结论

研究结果表明,需要帮助黑人家庭在其子女使用的多个系统中进行协商,重点关注文化症状表现的临床培训,在社区环境中对亚洲人进行筛查,并对所有项目进行强制性文化能力评估。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验