Smalley S R, Schomberg P J, Earle J D, Laws E R, Scheithauer B W, O'Fallon J R
Division of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, MN 55905.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1990 May;18(5):1165-71. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(90)90454-r.
Twenty-seven hemangioblastomas of the central nervous system were treated at the Mayo Clinic with radiation therapy from January 1963 to August 1983. Six patients had von-Hippel Lindau syndrome, and four presented with polycythemia. The median age among the 15 males and 12 females was 48 years (range 20-68). Two clinical groups were apparent: those that received postoperative radiation therapy for clinically suspect, or microscopically positive margins (6 patients) and those who underwent therapy for gross residual disease (20 patients). One patient did not fall into either group because his initially unresectable tumor was treated with planned pre-operative radiotherapy to 40 Gy and was subsequently successfully cured by surgery. Because the combined modality approach did not allow assessment of local control with radiation alone, he was excluded from the gross residual cohort in terms of time-dose relationship analysis. The cohort with gross residual disease was particularly unfavorable as 12 of these patients had developed 17 local recurrences prior to radiation. Three had multiple lesions, and four had the von-Hippel Lindau syndrome. In-field disease control appeared to be improved when patients were treated more aggressively. Patients treated to a dose of 50 Gy manifested local control in 4/7 (57%) vs 4/12 (33%) in patients treated to less than 50 Gy. In-field local control was also better if patients received a TDF greater than 75 (local control in 66%) vs a TDF of 65-75 (local control in 22%). Actuarial analysis of in-field disease control showed more aggressive treatment improved control whether analyzed by dose level (greater than or equal to 50 Gy vs less than 50 Gy, or TDF greater than 75 vs less than 75). Four of the six patients who received radiation therapy for microscopically positive or clinically suspect margins achieved local control. Both patients manifesting in-field relapse were successfully surgically salvaged. Overall survival for the entire group of 27 patients was 85%, 58%, 58%, and 46% at 5, 10, 15, and 20 years, respectively. Recurrence-free survival was 76%, 52%, and 42% at 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively. Half of all in-field recurrences had occurred by 2 years, but the remaining half recurred from 5.6 to 14.4 years. Patients who developed in-field failure usually died from disease with a median survival of only 1.5 years, but surgical salvage was accomplished in 4/12. Hydro-myelia developed in two patients and required operation. Surveillance for systemic tumors also was important and revealed seven benign and four malignant tumors.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
1963年1月至1983年8月,梅奥诊所对27例中枢神经系统血管母细胞瘤患者进行了放射治疗。6例患者患有冯·希佩尔-林道综合征,4例表现为红细胞增多症。15例男性和12例女性的中位年龄为48岁(范围20 - 68岁)。明显分为两个临床组:一组是因临床怀疑或显微镜下切缘阳性而接受术后放疗的患者(6例),另一组是针对肉眼残留病灶进行治疗的患者(20例)。有1例患者不属于这两组中的任何一组,因为他最初无法切除的肿瘤接受了计划的术前40 Gy放疗,随后通过手术成功治愈。由于联合治疗方法无法单独评估放疗的局部控制情况,在时间 - 剂量关系分析中,他被排除在肉眼残留队列之外。肉眼残留病灶组情况特别不利,因为这些患者中有12例在放疗前已出现17次局部复发。3例有多个病灶,4例患有冯·希佩尔-林道综合征。当患者接受更积极的治疗时,野内疾病控制似乎有所改善。接受50 Gy剂量治疗的患者中有4/7(57%)实现了局部控制,而接受低于50 Gy剂量治疗的患者中这一比例为4/12(33%)。如果患者接受的总剂量因子(TDF)大于75,野内局部控制也更好(局部控制率为66%),而TDF为65 - 75时局部控制率为22%。对野内疾病控制的精算分析表明,无论按剂量水平(大于或等于50 Gy与小于50 Gy,或TDF大于75与小于75)分析,更积极的治疗都能改善控制情况。因显微镜下切缘阳性或临床怀疑而接受放疗的6例患者中有4例实现了局部控制。2例出现野内复发的患者均通过手术成功挽救。27例患者的总体生存率在5年、10年、15年和20年时分别为85%、58%、58%和46%。无复发生存率在5年、10年和15年时分别为76%、52%和42%。所有野内复发中有一半在2年内发生,其余一半在5.6至14.4年复发。出现野内失败的患者通常死于疾病,中位生存期仅为1.5年,但12例中有4例通过手术挽救。2例患者发生了脊髓空洞症并需要手术。对全身肿瘤的监测也很重要,发现了7例良性肿瘤和4例恶性肿瘤。(摘要截短至400字)