• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

家庭医疗中电话随访支持与多组分戒烟干预联合应用的效果:一项群组随机试验

Effectiveness of telephone-based follow-up support delivered in combination with a multi-component smoking cessation intervention in family practice: a cluster-randomized trial.

机构信息

MINTO Prevention and Rehabilitation Centre, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Prev Med. 2013 Jun;56(6):390-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.02.018. Epub 2013 Feb 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.02.018
PMID:23480968
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether telephone-based smoking cessation follow-up counseling (FC), when delivered as part of a multi-component intervention program is associated with increased rates of follow-up support and smoking abstinence.

METHODS

A cluster randomized controlled-trial was conducted within family medicine practices in Ontario, Canada. Consecutive adult patients who smoked were enrolled at two time points, the baseline period (2009) and the post-intervention period (2009-2011). Smoking abstinence was determined by telephone interview 4 months following enrollment. Both groups implemented a multi-component intervention program. Practices randomized to the FC group could also refer patients to a follow-up support program which involved 5 telephone contacts over a 2-month period.

RESULTS

Eight practices, 130 providers, and 928 eligible patients participated in the study. No statistically significant difference in 7-day point-prevalence abstinence was observed between intervention groups. There was a significant increase in referral to follow-up in both intervention groups. Significantly higher rates of smoking abstinence [25.7% vs. 11.3%; adjusted OR 3.1 (95% CI: 1.1, 8.6), p<0.05] were documented among the twenty-nine percent of FC participants who were referred to the follow-up support program compared to the MC group.

CONCLUSION

Access to external follow-up support did not increase rates at which follow-up support was delivered.

摘要

目的

确定电话戒烟随访咨询(FC)是否与随访支持和戒烟率的提高有关,作为多组分干预计划的一部分。

方法

在加拿大安大略省的家庭医学实践中进行了一项集群随机对照试验。在基线期(2009 年)和干预后期(2009-2011 年),连续招募了吸烟的成年患者。通过电话访谈在入组后 4 个月确定戒烟情况。两组均实施了多组分干预计划。随机分配到 FC 组的实践也可以将患者转介到随访支持计划,该计划包括在 2 个月内进行 5 次电话联系。

结果

8 个实践、130 个提供者和 928 名合格患者参与了研究。干预组之间的 7 天点预患病率戒烟率没有统计学上的显著差异。两组的转介到随访的人数均有所增加。在被转介到随访支持计划的 FC 参与者中,有 29%的人记录到更高的戒烟率[25.7%比 11.3%;调整后的 OR 3.1(95%CI:1.1, 8.6),p<0.05],与 MC 组相比。

结论

获得外部随访支持并没有增加提供随访支持的比例。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of telephone-based follow-up support delivered in combination with a multi-component smoking cessation intervention in family practice: a cluster-randomized trial.家庭医疗中电话随访支持与多组分戒烟干预联合应用的效果:一项群组随机试验
Prev Med. 2013 Jun;56(6):390-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.02.018. Epub 2013 Feb 26.
2
Evaluating the effectiveness of a single telephone contact as an adjunct to a self-help intervention for smoking cessation in a randomized controlled trial.在一项随机对照试验中,评估单次电话联系作为戒烟自助干预辅助手段的有效性。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2008 Jan;10(1):129-35. doi: 10.1080/14622200701767746.
3
A randomized controlled trial of multiple tailored messages for smoking cessation among callers to the cancer information service.针对癌症信息服务热线来电者的多种定制戒烟信息的随机对照试验。
J Health Commun. 2005;10 Suppl 1:105-18. doi: 10.1080/10810730500263810.
4
Benefits of telephone care over primary care for smoking cessation: a randomized trial.电话护理相对于初级护理在戒烟方面的益处:一项随机试验。
Arch Intern Med. 2006 Mar 13;166(5):536-42. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.5.536.
5
A randomized trial of a proactive cellular telephone intervention for smokers living with HIV/AIDS.一项针对感染艾滋病毒/艾滋病的吸烟者的前瞻性手机干预随机试验。
AIDS. 2006 Jan 9;20(2):253-60. doi: 10.1097/01.aids.0000198094.23691.58.
6
Effectiveness of a stepped primary care smoking cessation intervention: cluster randomized clinical trial (ISTAPS study).一项基于初级保健的分阶段戒烟干预措施的有效性:整群随机临床试验(ISTAPS 研究)。
Addiction. 2011 Sep;106(9):1696-706. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03491.x. Epub 2011 Jul 22.
7
A randomized controlled trial of smoking cessation counseling after myocardial infarction.心肌梗死后戒烟咨询的随机对照试验。
Prev Med. 2000 Apr;30(4):261-8. doi: 10.1006/pmed.2000.0644.
8
Smoking cessation intervention in parents of young children: a randomised controlled trial.针对幼儿父母的戒烟干预:一项随机对照试验。
Addiction. 2005 Nov;100(11):1731-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01231.x.
9
The effect of proactively identifying smokers and offering smoking cessation support in primary care populations: a cluster-randomized trial.在基层医疗人群中主动识别吸烟者并提供戒烟支持的效果:一项整群随机试验。
Addiction. 2008 Jun;103(6):998-1006; discussion 1007-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02206.x. Epub 2008 Apr 16.
10
Efficacy of telephone counseling for pregnant smokers: a randomized controlled trial.针对怀孕吸烟者的电话咨询效果:一项随机对照试验。
Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Jul;108(1):83-92. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000218100.05601.f8.

引用本文的文献

1
Barriers to smoking interventions in community healthcare settings: a scoping review.社区医疗环境中吸烟干预的障碍:范围综述。
Health Promot Int. 2024 Apr 1;39(2). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daae036.
2
Strategies to improve smoking cessation rates in primary care.提高初级保健中戒烟率的策略。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 6;9(9):CD011556. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011556.pub2.
3
Current practices and perceived barriers to tobacco-treatment delivery among healthcare professionals from 15 European countries. The EPACTT Plus project.
来自15个欧洲国家的医疗保健专业人员在烟草治疗服务提供方面的现行做法及认知障碍。EPACTT Plus项目。
Tob Prev Cessat. 2020 Jan 21;6:6. doi: 10.18332/tpc/115033. eCollection 2020.
4
Impact of the ENSP eLearning platform on improving knowledge, attitudes and self-efficacy for treating tobacco dependence: An assessment across 15 European countries.欧洲戒烟培训与支持计划(ENSP)电子学习平台对改善烟草依赖治疗知识、态度和自我效能的影响:一项涵盖15个欧洲国家的评估
Tob Induc Dis. 2020 May 7;18:40. doi: 10.18332/tid/120188. eCollection 2020.
5
Factors associated with rates of tobacco treatment delivery by General Practitioners in Greece: Missed opportunities for prevention?希腊全科医生提供烟草治疗的比率相关因素:预防的错失机会?
Tob Induc Dis. 2018 May 21;16:21. doi: 10.18332/tid/90822. eCollection 2018.
6
Telephone counselling for smoking cessation.戒烟的电话咨询服务。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 May 2;5(5):CD002850. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002850.pub4.
7
From Good to Great: The Role of Performance Coaching in Enhancing Tobacco-Dependence Treatment Rates.从优秀到卓越:绩效辅导在提高烟草依赖治疗率中的作用。
Ann Fam Med. 2018 Nov;16(6):498-506. doi: 10.1370/afm.2312.
8
Interactive Voice Response Calls to Promote Smoking Cessation after Hospital Discharge: Pooled Analysis of Two Randomized Clinical Trials.互动语音电话在促进出院后戒烟中的作用:两项随机临床试验的汇总分析。
J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Sep;32(9):1005-1013. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4085-z. Epub 2017 Jun 14.
9
Managing smoking cessation.管理戒烟
CMAJ. 2016 Dec 6;188(17-18):E484-E492. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.151510. Epub 2016 Oct 3.
10
Increasing Rates of Tobacco Treatment Delivery in Primary Care Practice: Evaluation of the Ottawa Model for Smoking Cessation.初级保健实践中烟草治疗服务提供率的提高:渥太华戒烟模型评估
Ann Fam Med. 2016 May;14(3):235-43. doi: 10.1370/afm.1909.