• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

节段尺寸、节段位置和股骨方位对髋关节表面置换失败的生物力学影响。

The biomechanical effect of notch size, notch location, and femur orientation on hip resurfacing failure.

机构信息

Martin Orthopaedic Biomechanics Laboratory, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON M5B 1W8, Canada.

出版信息

IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2013 Aug;60(8):2214-21. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2013.2251745. Epub 2013 Mar 7.

DOI:10.1109/TBME.2013.2251745
PMID:23481682
Abstract

For hip resurfacing, this is the first biomechanical study to assess anterior and posterior femoral neck notching and femur flexion and extension. Forty-seven artificial femurs were implanted with the Birmingham hip resurfacing (BHR) using a range of notch sizes (0, 2, and 5 mm), notch locations (superior, anterior, and posterior), and femur orientations (neutral stance, flexion, and extension). Implant preparation was done using imageless computer navigation, and mechanical tests measured stiffness and strength. For notch size and location, in neutral stance the unnotched group had 1.9 times greater strength than the 5-mm superior notch group (4539 N versus 2423 N, p=0.047), and the 5-mm anterior notch group had 1.6 times greater strength than the 5-mm superior notch group, yielding a borderline statistical difference (3988 N versus 2423 N, p = 0.056). For femur orientation, in the presence of a 5-mm anterior notch, femurs in neutral stance had 2.2 times greater stiffness than femurs in 25° flexion (1542 N/mm versus 696 N/mm, p = 0.000). Similarly, in the presence of a 5-mm posterior notch, femurs in neutral stance had 2.8 times greater stiffness than femurs in 25° extension (1637 N/mm versus 575 N/mm, p = 0.000). No other statistical differences were noted. All femurs failed through the neck. The results have implications for BHR surgical techniques and recommended patient activities.

摘要

对于髋关节表面置换术,这是第一项评估股骨颈前向和后向切迹以及股骨屈/伸的生物力学研究。使用一系列切迹尺寸(0、2 和 5mm)、切迹位置(上、前和后)和股骨方向(中立位、屈曲和伸展),将 47 个人工股骨植入 Birmingham 髋关节表面置换(BHR)中。采用无图像计算机导航进行植入物准备,力学测试测量了刚度和强度。对于切迹尺寸和位置,在中立位时,未切迹组的强度比 5mm 上切迹组大 1.9 倍(4539N 比 2423N,p=0.047),5mm 前切迹组的强度比 5mm 上切迹组大 1.6 倍,产生了临界统计学差异(3988N 比 2423N,p=0.056)。对于股骨方向,在前切迹 5mm 的情况下,中立位股骨的刚度比 25°屈曲时的股骨大 2.2 倍(1542N/mm 比 696N/mm,p=0.000)。同样,在后切迹 5mm 的情况下,中立位股骨的刚度比 25°伸展时的股骨大 2.8 倍(1637N/mm 比 575N/mm,p=0.000)。没有发现其他统计学差异。所有股骨均在颈部断裂。这些结果对 BHR 手术技术和推荐的患者活动有影响。

相似文献

1
The biomechanical effect of notch size, notch location, and femur orientation on hip resurfacing failure.节段尺寸、节段位置和股骨方位对髋关节表面置换失败的生物力学影响。
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2013 Aug;60(8):2214-21. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2013.2251745. Epub 2013 Mar 7.
2
The impact of proximal femoral morphology on failure strength with a mid-head resection short-stem hip arthroplasty.股骨近端形态对采用股骨头中部截骨短柄髋关节置换术时的失效强度的影响。
Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2014 Dec;228(12):1275-80. doi: 10.1177/0954411914562872.
3
A biomechanical study of the Birmingham mid head resection arthroplasty: effect of stem size on femoral neck fracture.伯明翰中头切除人工关节置换术的生物力学研究:柄大小对股骨颈骨折的影响
Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2013 Aug;227(8):913-8. doi: 10.1177/0954411913485057. Epub 2013 May 1.
4
The biomechanical effect of proximal tumor defect location on femur pathological fractures.近端肿瘤缺损位置对股骨病理性骨折的生物力学影响。
J Orthop Trauma. 2013 Aug;27(8):e174-80. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3182809748.
5
A biomechanical and finite element analysis of femoral neck notching during hip resurfacing.髋关节表面置换术中股骨颈开槽的生物力学与有限元分析
J Biomech Eng. 2009 Apr;131(4):041002. doi: 10.1115/1.3072889.
6
Increased strain in the femoral neck following insertion of a resurfacing femoral prosthesis.表面置换型股骨假体植入后股骨颈应变增加。
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010 Mar;92(3):461-7. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.92B3.22592.
7
Position of hip resurfacing component affects strain and resistance to fracture in the femoral neck.髋关节表面置换组件的位置会影响股骨颈的应变和抗骨折能力。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Sep;90(9):1951-60. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00788.
8
Biomechanical comparison of extended trochanteric osteotomy and slot osteotomy for femoral component revision in total hip arthroplasty.全髋关节置换术中股骨部件翻修时大转子延长截骨术与开槽截骨术的生物力学比较
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2007 Jun;22(5):599-602. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2006.02.002. Epub 2007 Mar 9.
9
Assessment of femoral neck fracture risk for a novel proximal epiphyseal hip prosthesis.新型近端骨骺型髋关节假体的股骨颈骨折风险评估
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2011 Jul;26(6):585-91. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2011.01.009. Epub 2011 Feb 22.
10
Evaluation of a new fluoroscopy-based navigation system in the placement of the femoral component in hip resurfacing.一种基于荧光透视的新型导航系统在髋关节表面置换术中股骨部件放置的评估。
Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2010;224(4):565-76. doi: 10.1243/09544119JEIM629.