Laborda J, Douillard J Y, Burg C, Lizzio E F, Ridge J, Levenbook I, Hoffman T
Laboratory of Cell Biology, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Bethesda, Maryland 20892.
J Nucl Med. 1990 Jun;31(6):1028-34.
The pharmacokinetics of two iodine-131-(131I) labeled murine anti-rat colon carcinoma monoclonal antibodies (D3 and E4) were compared in normal Sprague Dawley rats, syngeneic BDIX rats, or nude mice bearing that tumor. Results of antibody uptake after i.v. administration were analyzed in terms of accumulation and localization indices for normal tissues and tumor. Statistically significant differences between rat and mouse tissue biodistribution were found. D3, which reacts in vitro with the tumor and several normal rat tissues, cleared quickly from the blood of rats and was specifically targeted to several normal tissues, notably the lung. Virtually no targeting to the tumor was observed. Nude mice, however, showed a slower blood clearance and specific antibody targeting only in the tumor. Similar results were seen after injection of another antibody, E4, which is tumor-specific in vitro. Data suggest that studies on the xenogeneic nude mouse model may not necessarily be relevant to the choice of monoclonal antibodies for clinical diagnostic imaging or therapy.
在正常的斯普拉格-道利大鼠、同基因的BDIX大鼠或携带该肿瘤的裸鼠中,比较了两种碘-131(¹³¹I)标记的鼠抗大鼠结肠癌单克隆抗体(D3和E4)的药代动力学。静脉给药后抗体摄取的结果根据正常组织和肿瘤的蓄积及定位指数进行分析。发现大鼠和小鼠组织生物分布之间存在统计学上的显著差异。D3在体外与肿瘤及几种正常大鼠组织发生反应,在大鼠血液中清除迅速,并特异性靶向几种正常组织,尤其是肺。几乎未观察到对肿瘤的靶向作用。然而,裸鼠显示出血清清除较慢,且特异性抗体仅靶向肿瘤。注射另一种在体外具有肿瘤特异性的抗体E4后也观察到类似结果。数据表明,对异种裸鼠模型的研究不一定与临床诊断成像或治疗中使用单克隆抗体的选择相关。