• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

臀先露-头先露的双胎生长受限妊娠在分娩时发生脐带缠绕的风险增加。

Pregnancies with growth-retarded twins in breech-vertex presentation at increased risk for entanglement during delivery.

作者信息

Rydhström H, Cullberg G

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Lund, Sweden.

出版信息

J Perinat Med. 1990;18(1):45-50. doi: 10.1515/jpme.1990.18.1.45.

DOI:10.1515/jpme.1990.18.1.45
PMID:2348331
Abstract

The purpose of this population based study on twins born in Sweden between 1961 and 1987 was to estimate the risk to the fetuses of becoming entangled during birth, and to identify those pregnancies with an increased risk for this rare complication. By using 3 separate questionnaires, 41 of 26,428 twin pregnancies with entanglement were identified. Twins in breech-vertex presentation (group A; 29 cases) were at significantly greater risk of entanglement (chi 2 = 168.3, p less than 0.001) than twins not in breech-vertex presentation (group B; 8 in vertex-vertex, 3 in breech-breech, and 1 in vertex-breech presentation). Known risk factors for entanglement in group A were intra-uterine growth retardation, a birth weight less than 2000 g, and antenatal fetal death. Intrapartum-neonatal mortality reached 38.9% in group A (median gestational week 36); and for group B, 8.3% (median gestational week 38). Entanglement during the study period occurred in 1 of 645 twin deliveries, on average. A vaginal delivery is proposed for women with twins in breech-vertex presentation, unless other risk factors leading to an increased risk for entanglement warrant abdominal delivery.

摘要

这项基于瑞典1961年至1987年出生的双胞胎人群的研究目的是评估胎儿在出生时发生缠绕的风险,并确定那些出现这种罕见并发症风险增加的妊娠情况。通过使用3份单独的调查问卷,在26428例双胞胎妊娠中识别出41例有缠绕情况。臀先露-头先露的双胞胎(A组;29例)发生缠绕的风险(卡方 = 168.3,p < 0.001)显著高于非臀先露-头先露的双胞胎(B组;8例头先露-头先露、3例臀先露-臀先露和1例头先露-臀先露)。A组中已知的缠绕风险因素包括宫内生长迟缓、出生体重低于2000g和产前胎儿死亡。A组的产时-新生儿死亡率达到38.9%(中位孕周36周);B组为8.3%(中位孕周38周)。在研究期间,平均每645例双胞胎分娩中有1例发生缠绕。对于臀先露-头先露的双胞胎孕妇,建议进行阴道分娩,除非其他导致缠绕风险增加的风险因素需要行剖宫产。

相似文献

1
Pregnancies with growth-retarded twins in breech-vertex presentation at increased risk for entanglement during delivery.臀先露-头先露的双胎生长受限妊娠在分娩时发生脐带缠绕的风险增加。
J Perinat Med. 1990;18(1):45-50. doi: 10.1515/jpme.1990.18.1.45.
2
Cesarean section for the second twin.对第二个双胞胎进行剖宫产。
J Reprod Med. 1997 Dec;42(12):767-70.
3
Management and outcome of vertex-breech and vertex-vertex presentation in twin gestation: a comparative study.双胎妊娠中头先露-臀先露与头先露-头先露胎位的管理及结局:一项比较研究
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1986 Jun;22(1-2):69-75. doi: 10.1016/0028-2243(86)90091-2.
4
Vaginal delivery of breech-vertex twins.臀先露-头先露双胎的阴道分娩
J Reprod Med. 1993 Nov;38(11):879-82.
5
Vaginal delivery of the second twin in breech presentation.臀位的第二胎经阴道分娩。
Obstet Gynecol. 1987 May;69(5):774-6.
6
Prognosis for twins with birth weight less than 1500 gm: the impact of cesarean section in relation to fetal presentation.出生体重低于1500克的双胞胎的预后:剖宫产对胎儿胎位的影响。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Aug;163(2):528-33. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(90)91190-n.
7
[Breech presentation in multiple pregnancy].[多胎妊娠中的臀先露]
Med Pregl. 1989;42(3-4):141-4.
8
Outcomes of vertex-vertex vs. vertex-breech presentation in twin pregnancy after vaginal delivery in China.中国经阴道分娩后双胎妊娠头位-头位与头位-臀位分娩结局比较。
Birth. 2023 Dec;50(4):978-987. doi: 10.1111/birt.12737. Epub 2023 Jul 23.
9
The impact of route of delivery and presentation on twin neonatal and infant mortality: a population-based study in the USA, 1995-97.分娩方式和产次对双胎新生儿及婴儿死亡率的影响:1995 - 1997年美国一项基于人群的研究
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2004 Apr;15(4):219-24. doi: 10.1080/14767050410001668707.
10
Fetal presentation and successful twin vaginal delivery.胎儿先露与双胎阴道分娩成功
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jan;214(1):116.e1-116.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.017. Epub 2015 Aug 18.