Röhm-Rodowald Ewa, Jakimiak Bozenna, Chojecka Agnieszka, Zmuda-Baranowska Magdalena, Kanclerski Krzysztof
Zakład Zwalczania Skazeń Biologicznych, Narodowego Instytutu Zdrowia Publicznego -PZH ul Chocimska, Warszawa.
Przegl Epidemiol. 2012;66(4):635-41.
Effective decontamination of instruments is a key element of infection control and the provision of high quality in dental care. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficiency of decontamination procedures including cleaning, disinfection and sterilization of re-usable instruments in dental practices in Poland.
The efficiency of disinfection and sterilization processes have been evaluated on the results of the questionnaires. The following information were taken into account: setting where disinfection and sterilization had been performed, preparation of dental equipment for sterilization (disinfection, washing and cleaning, packaging), the types of autoclaves and used types of sterilization cycles, routine monitoring and documentation of sterilization processes, treatment of handpieces and the frequency of surface decontamination.
Data were collected from 43 dental practices (35 dental offices and 8 clinics). Disinfection and cleaning processes were performed manually in 63% of dental offices and ultrasonic baths were used in 53% of settings. Washer disinfectors were used in 23% of dental practices: in every researched clinic and in a few dental offices. All sterilization processes were performed in steam autoclaves, mainly in small steam sterilizers (81%). Dental handpieces were sterilized in 72% of practices, but only 33% of them performed sterilization in recommended cycle B. Sterilization processes were monitored with chemical indicators in 33% of practices. Biological monitoring of the processes was carried out at different intervals. Incorrect documentation of instruments and surfaces decontamination was recorded in several settings.
There is still a need for improvement of decontamination processes in dental practice in Poland. Areas for improvement include: replacement of manual cleaning and disinfection processes with automatic processes, sterilization of dental handpieces after each patient, monitoring of a sterilization process with chemical and biological indicators. Reported incorrect procedures in decontamination of medical devices performed by questioned dentists and lack or inadequate response to asked questions indicate the lack of adequate knowledge about decontamination. Personnel who performs decontamination processes should be continuously trained.
器械的有效去污是感染控制和提供高质量牙科护理的关键要素。本研究的目的是评估波兰牙科诊所中包括可重复使用器械的清洁、消毒和灭菌在内的去污程序的效率。
根据问卷调查结果评估消毒和灭菌过程的效率。考虑了以下信息:进行消毒和灭菌的场所、牙科设备的灭菌准备(消毒、清洗和清洁、包装)、高压灭菌器的类型和使用的灭菌周期类型、灭菌过程的常规监测和记录、手机的处理以及表面去污的频率。
从43家牙科诊所(35家牙科诊室和8家诊所)收集了数据。63%的牙科诊室采用手动进行消毒和清洁,53%的场所使用超声波清洗槽。23%的牙科诊所使用清洗消毒器:在每家被研究的诊所和少数牙科诊室中使用。所有灭菌过程均在蒸汽高压灭菌器中进行,主要是在小型蒸汽灭菌器中(81%)。72%的诊所对牙科手机进行灭菌,但其中只有33%按照推荐的B周期进行灭菌。33%的诊所使用化学指示剂监测灭菌过程。对这些过程进行了不同间隔的生物监测。在一些场所记录到器械和表面去污的记录不正确。
波兰牙科诊所的去污过程仍有改进的必要。改进的方面包括:用自动化过程取代手动清洁和消毒过程、每位患者后对牙科手机进行灭菌、使用化学和生物指示剂监测灭菌过程。报告的被质疑牙医在医疗器械去污方面的错误程序以及对所提问题缺乏或不充分的回应表明缺乏足够的去污知识。进行去污过程的人员应持续接受培训。