文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

医疗专业人员在临床决策中使用个人数字助理:系统评价。

The use of personal digital assistants in clinical decision making by health care professionals: a systematic review.

机构信息

University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, UK.

出版信息

Health Informatics J. 2013 Mar;19(1):16-28. doi: 10.1177/1460458212446761.


DOI:10.1177/1460458212446761
PMID:23486823
Abstract

Ownership of personal digital assistants (PDAs) and smartphones by health professionals is increasingly common. Providing the best available evidence at the point of care is important for time-poor clinical staff and may lead to benefits in the processes and outcomes of clinical care. This review was performed to investigate the usefulness of PDAs in the clinical setting. MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from 2000 to March 2010. Randomised controlled trials that evaluated the effects on the processes or outcomes of clinical care of using PDAs compared with not using a PDA were included. Two reviewers independently reviewed citations and abstracts, assessed full text articles and abstracted data from the studies. Seven trials met the review inclusion criteria, of which only three were of satisfactory quality. Studies investigated the use of PDAs either in recording patient information or in decision support for diagnoses or treatment. An increase in data collection quality was reported, and the appropriateness of diagnosis and treatment decisions was improved. PDAs appear to have potential in improving some processes and outcomes of clinical care, but the evidence is limited and reliable conclusions on whether they help, in what circumstances and how they should be used are not possible. Further research is required to assess their value and ensure full benefits from their widespread use, but the pace of technological development creates problems for the timely evaluation of these devices and their applications.

摘要

个人数字助理(PDAs)和智能手机在医疗专业人员中越来越普及。在医疗保健点提供最佳现有证据对时间紧张的临床工作人员非常重要,并且可能会对临床护理的流程和结果带来益处。本次综述旨在研究 PDAs 在临床环境中的实用性。从 2000 年至 2010 年 3 月,对 MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库进行了检索。纳入了比较使用 PDA 与不使用 PDA 对临床护理流程或结果产生影响的随机对照试验。两位评审员独立地对引用和摘要进行了审查,评估了全文文章并从研究中提取了数据。有 7 项试验符合综述纳入标准,但只有 3 项的质量令人满意。这些研究调查了 PDAs 在记录患者信息或用于诊断或治疗的决策支持中的使用情况。报告称数据收集质量有所提高,并且诊断和治疗决策的适当性得到了改善。PDAs 似乎有可能改善临床护理的某些流程和结果,但证据有限,无法确定它们是否有帮助、在什么情况下有帮助以及如何使用。需要进一步研究来评估它们的价值,并确保从广泛使用中获得充分的收益,但技术发展的步伐给这些设备及其应用的及时评估带来了问题。

相似文献

[1]
The use of personal digital assistants in clinical decision making by health care professionals: a systematic review.

Health Informatics J. 2013-3

[2]
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.

JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016-4

[3]
Interventions for promoting habitual exercise in people living with and beyond cancer.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-9-19

[4]
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-1-16

[5]
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011-10-5

[6]
Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-7-8

[7]
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of computer and other electronic aids for smoking cessation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Health Technol Assess. 2012

[8]
The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11.

Med Teach. 2009-4

[9]
Conservative, physical and surgical interventions for managing faecal incontinence and constipation in adults with central neurological diseases.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024-10-29

[10]
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.

Health Technol Assess. 2001

引用本文的文献

[1]
The effect of smartphones and mobile apps in Egyptian Emergency Departments: A cross-sectional study.

Afr J Emerg Med. 2025-6

[2]
Digital tracking, provider decision support systems, and targeted client communication via mobile devices to improve primary health care.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025-4-7

[3]
Health professionals' acceptance of mobile-based clinical guideline application in a resource-limited setting: using a modified UTAUT model.

BMC Med Educ. 2024-6-25

[4]
Perceived Benefits and Disadvantages Associated with the Use of the Electronic Consultation Register by Health Providers in the Health District of Toma, Burkina Faso.

Int J MCH AIDS. 2024-3-14

[5]
The Role of Mobile Health Technology in Perioperative Spinal Care: A Systematic Scoping Review and Narrative Synthesis.

Cureus. 2024-2-15

[6]
Developing interventions to improve detection of depression in primary healthcare settings in rural Ethiopia.

BJPsych Open. 2024-2-26

[7]
mHealth app usage amongst paediatric department doctors in South Africa.

Afr Health Sci. 2023-9

[8]
Stressors, Resources, and Strain Associated with Digitization Processes of Medical Staff Working in Neurosurgical and Vascular Surgical Hospital Wards: A Multimethod Study.

Healthcare (Basel). 2023-7-9

[9]
Development of Mobile Application-Based System for Improving Medication Adherence Among Cancer Patients Receiving Palliative Therapy.

Indian J Palliat Care. 2023

[10]
Framework to assess the quality of mHealth apps: a mixed-method international case study protocol.

BMJ Open. 2022-10-28

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索