Eddy Kylie, Jordan Zoe, Stephenson Matthew
Joanna Briggs Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
Teamwork is seen as an important element of patient care in acute hospital settings. The complexity of the journey of care for patients highlights the need for health professionals to collaborate and communicate clearly with each other. Health organizations in western countries are committed to improving patient safety through education of staff and teamwork education programs have been integral to this focus. There are no current systematic reviews of the experience of health professionals who participate in teamwork education in acute hospital settings.
The objective of this systematic review was to search for the best available evidence on the experiences of health professionals who participate in teamwork education in acute hospital settings.
This review considered studies reporting on experiences of registered health professionals who work in acute hospitals. This included medical, nursing and midwifery and allied health professionals.
The focus of the meta-synthesis was the experiences and reflections of health professionals who were involved in teamwork education in acute hospital settings.
The geographical context for this review was acute hospitals in rural or metropolitan settings in Australia and overseas countries. The review focused on the experiences of health professionals who work in acute hospitals and participated in teamwork education programs.
This review considered studies that focused on qualitative data including, but not limited to, designs such as phenomenology, grounded theory, ethnography, action research and feminist research.In the absence of research studies, other text such as opinion papers, discussion papers and reports were considered. Studies published in English and from 1990 to 2013 were included in this review.
The literature search for relevant papers occurred between 13 September and 26 October 2013. A three-step search strategy was utilized in this review. The databases searched were PubMed, CINAHL, Embase and Scopus.
The standardized critical appraisal tool the Joanna Briggs Institute Qualitative Assessment and Review Instrument (JBI-QARI) was used to assess the methodological quality of included papers.
Data that included statements and text of interest was extracted from papers included in the study using the standardized data extraction tool from JBI-QARI.
Qualitative research findings were pooled using JBI-QARI. This involved the aggregation and synthesis of findings to generate a set of statements that represented that aggregation.
In total, 116 papers were selected for analysis of full text, 11 papers were selected for critical appraisal and seven papers were selected for data synthesis. This resulted in 44 findings. The findings were assigned to 16 categories based on identified similarities across the papers. The categories were integrated into six meta-syntheses. These were: Meta-synthesis One: It is important to recognize that organizational culture and expectations have an impact on health professionals' participation and experience of teamwork education. Meta-synthesis Two: Understanding how successful teams function is central to the development of teamwork education programs and the experience of participants. Meta-synthesis Three: A health professional's experience of teamwork education will be influenced by his/her starting point of learning. Meta-synthesis Four: Participants highly value teamwork education programs that are implemented by facilitators who create practical authentic learning opportunities and foster reflection and debriefing for participants. Meta-synthesis Five: High fidelity simulation used with specific communication strategies provides a powerful learning opportunity for health professions to practice teamwork skills. Meta-synthesis Six: Participants have increased confidence and are motivated to apply their newly learnt teamwork skills into their daily practice.
The review identified qualitative evidence that can guide organizations and education facilitators in the development and implementation of teamwork education in acute hospital settings. Although the quality of the specific teamwork education programs was an important factor, there were a number of issues that also impacted on the experiences of health professionals who participated in teamwork education programs. These included the context that the program was delivered in, the diversity of health care teams, starting points of individual learners, the type of tools utilized in education programs, the levels of confidence and motivation of learners post training and the opportunity to transfer into practice new learning.
Drawing from the synthesized findings of the review, recommendations for practice have been devised in order to guide the development and implementation of teamwork education in acute hospital settings and to improve the experience of participating health professionals. The Joanna Briggs Institute utilizes Grades of Recommendation to rate a health management strategy in terms of its desirable effects, evidence of adequate quality supporting its use, benefits of use, and the inclusion of patient experience, values and preferences. A strong recommendation has a Grade A and a weak recommendation has a Grade B. The FAME (Feasibility, Appropriateness, Meaningfulness and Effectiveness) scale was used to inform the strength of the following six recommendations for practice from the review: RECOMMENDATION ONE: All members of a team should be encouraged by their organization/managers to participate in teamwork education programs in order to foster a positive culture of learning and teamwork within the team.JBI Recommendation: Grade A. This recommendation is appropriate and applicable to all health professionals in acute hospital settings, is associated with positive experiences for participants of teamwork education programs and has a beneficial effect on participants.
Facilitators of teamwork education programs should understand how successful teams function and consider these factors when planning or delivering training.JBI Recommendation: Grade A. This recommendation is associated with positive experiences for participants and creates a beneficial effect to the quality of a teamwork education program.
Facilitators of teamwork education programs need to explore participant learning needs and their prior experiences of working in teams before implementing teamwork education programs.JBI Recommendation: Grade A. This recommendation creates a beneficial effect to the participants of teamwork education programs and to the quality of education provided by facilitators.
Facilitators of teamwork education programs should provide learning opportunities that are practical, authentic to participants and foster constructive debriefing and reflection.JBI Recommendation: Grade A. This recommendation is applicable to all health professionals and circumstances in which teamwork education occurs, is associated with positive experiences and has a beneficial effect on participants.
High fidelity simulation should be considered in acute hospitals for the training of teamwork skills in addition to clinical skills. Scenarios provide realistic opportunities for participants to practice communication strategies that enhance teamwork.JBI Recommendation: Grade A. This recommendation is applicable to all health professionals and circumstances in which teamwork education occurs and has a beneficial effect on participants of education programs.
Team managers should harness the new confidence and motivation of staff around teamwork skills following participation in teamwork education programs and ensure that there are opportunities in the workplace to apply new skills and knowledge into daily practice.JBI Recommendation: Grade A. This recommendation is applicable to all health professionals and circumstances in which teamwork education occurs, is adaptable to a variety of circumstances and has a beneficial effect on health professional's daily practice of teamwork skills.
In order to strengthen the evidence base about teamwork education in acute hospital settings there needs to be quantitative and qualitative research into:How organizations that have successfully embedded a culture of collaboration and safety in health teams have planned, implemented and evaluated teamwork education programs in acute hospital settings?What are the characteristics of teams that have led to successful participation in teamwork education and positive outcomes for team performance?What are the experiences, training and support provided to education facilitators who successfully implement teamwork education programs in acute hospitals?
团队合作被视为急症医院环境中患者护理的重要元素。患者护理过程的复杂性凸显了医疗专业人员相互协作与清晰沟通的必要性。西方国家的卫生组织致力于通过员工教育来提高患者安全,团队合作教育项目一直是这一重点工作的组成部分。目前尚无关于急症医院环境中参与团队合作教育的医疗专业人员经历的系统评价。
本系统评价的目的是寻找关于急症医院环境中参与团队合作教育的医疗专业人员经历的最佳现有证据。
纳入标准 参与者类型:本评价纳入了报告急症医院注册医疗专业人员经历的研究。这包括医学、护理、助产及相关医疗专业人员。
元综合分析的重点是参与急症医院环境团队合作教育的医疗专业人员的经历和反思。
本评价的地理背景是澳大利亚及海外国家农村或城市环境中的急症医院。评价聚焦于在急症医院工作并参与团队合作教育项目的医疗专业人员的经历。
本评价纳入了侧重于定性数据的研究,包括但不限于现象学、扎根理论、民族志、行动研究和女性主义研究等设计。在缺乏研究性研究的情况下,也考虑了其他文本,如意见书、讨论文件和报告。本评价纳入了1990年至2013年以英文发表的研究。
2013年9月13日至10月26日期间对相关文献进行了检索。本评价采用了三步检索策略。检索的数据库包括PubMed、CINAHL、Embase和Scopus。
使用乔安娜·布里格斯研究所定性评估与综述工具(JBI-QARI)这一标准化批判性评价工具来评估纳入论文的方法学质量。
使用JBI-QARI的标准化数据提取工具从纳入研究的论文中提取包括感兴趣的陈述和文本在内的数据。
使用JBI-QARI对定性研究结果进行汇总。这涉及对结果的汇总和综合,以生成一组代表该汇总结果的陈述。
总共筛选出116篇论文进行全文分析,11篇论文进行批判性评价,7篇论文进行数据综合。这产生了44个研究结果。根据论文间确定的相似性,将这些结果归为16个类别。这些类别被整合为六个元综合。它们分别是:元综合一:认识到组织文化和期望对医疗专业人员参与团队合作教育及体验有影响很重要。元综合二:理解成功团队的运作方式是团队合作教育项目开发及参与者体验的核心。元综合三:医疗专业人员的团队合作教育体验将受其学习起点的影响。元综合四:参与者高度重视由能创造实际真实学习机会并促进参与者反思和汇报的促进者实施的团队合作教育项目。元综合五:结合特定沟通策略使用的高保真模拟为医疗专业人员提供了练习团队合作技能的有力学习机会。元综合六:参与者信心增强,并有动力将新学到的团队合作技能应用到日常实践中。
该评价确定了定性证据,可指导组织和教育促进者在急症医院环境中开展和实施团队合作教育。尽管特定团队合作教育项目的质量是一个重要因素,但也有许多问题影响了参与团队合作教育项目的医疗专业人员的体验。这些问题包括项目实施的背景、医疗团队的多样性、个体学习者的起点、教育项目中使用的工具类型、培训后学习者的信心和动力水平以及将新学到的知识转化为实践的机会。
根据该评价的综合研究结果,制定了实践建议,以指导急症医院环境中团队合作教育的开发和实施,并改善参与的医疗专业人员的体验。乔安娜·布里格斯研究所利用推荐等级来评估健康管理策略的预期效果、支持其使用的足够质量的证据、使用的益处以及对患者体验及价值观和偏好的纳入情况。强烈推荐为A级,弱推荐为B级。使用FAME(可行性、适宜性、意义性和有效性)量表来确定该评价中以下六项实践建议的强度:建议一:组织/管理者应鼓励团队所有成员参与团队合作教育项目,以在团队内营造积极的学习和团队合作文化。JBI推荐等级:A级。该建议适用于急症医院环境中的所有医疗专业人员,与团队合作教育项目参与者的积极体验相关,并对参与者有有益影响。
团队合作教育项目的促进者应了解成功团队的运作方式,并在规划或提供培训时考虑这些因素。JBI推荐等级:A级。该建议与参与者的积极体验相关,并对团队合作教育项目的质量产生有益影响。
团队合作教育项目的促进者在实施团队合作教育项目前,需要探索参与者的学习需求及其之前的团队工作经验。JBI推荐等级:A级。该建议对团队合作教育项目的参与者以及促进者提供的教育质量产生有益影响。
团队合作教育项目的促进者应提供对参与者来说实际、真实且能促进建设性汇报和反思的学习机会。JBI推荐等级:A级。该建议适用于所有医疗专业人员以及团队合作教育发生的所有情况,与积极体验相关,并对参与者有有益影响。
急症医院除临床技能培训外,应考虑使用高保真模拟来培训团队合作技能。情景为参与者提供了练习增强团队合作的沟通策略的现实机会。JBI推荐等级:A级。该建议适用于所有医疗专业人员以及团队合作教育发生的所有情况,并对教育项目的参与者有有益影响。
团队管理者应利用员工参与团队合作教育项目后围绕团队合作技能产生的新信心和动力,并确保工作场所存在将新技能和知识应用于日常实践的机会。JBI推荐等级:A级。该建议适用于所有医疗专业人员以及团队合作教育发生的所有情况,可适应各种情况,并对医疗专业人员团队合作技能的日常实践有有益影响。
为了加强关于急症医院环境中团队合作教育的证据基础,需要对以下方面进行定量和定性研究:成功在医疗团队中融入协作与安全文化组织如何在急症医院环境中规划、实施和评估团队合作教育项目?导致成功参与团队合作教育并取得团队绩效积极成果的团队有哪些特征?在急症医院成功实施团队合作教育项目的教育促进者获得了哪些经历、培训和支持?