Department of Cardiology, Congenital Heart Disease and Electrotherapy, Silesian Medical University, Silesian Centre for Heart Diseases, Skłodowskiej-Curie Street 9, 41-800 Zabrze, Poland.
Europace. 2013 Jun;15(6):835-44. doi: 10.1093/europace/eus390. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
The aim of the study was to assess the predictive value for outcomes of various response criteria currently used in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).
Data from TRUST CRT randomized trial in patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) III-IV class, QRS ≥ 120 ms, ejection fraction ≤ 35%, and mechanical dyssynchrony was analysed. Ninety-seven subjects who survived 6 months after implantation of CRT-defibrillator were classified as responders or non-responders depending on 15 criteria used in most of the previous trials. Blindly adjudicated data on major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) within 1 year after classification were used to calculate the predictive value of response criteria. After adjustment for baseline confounding variables only eight criteria were significantly predictive for future MACEs. Sensitivity and specificity ranged substantially for clinical (32-94% and 26-63%) and echocardiographic criteria (40-93% and 22-70%, respectively). The most powerful clinical predictor was >a NYHA class reduction ≥ 1 [adjusted relative risk (RR) 4.41 for non-responders; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.75-11.04, P = 0.002], while the strongest echocardiographic predictor was a reduction in the left ventricular end-systolic index by > 15% (RR 3.49; 95% CI 1.59-7.64, P = 0.002). A combination of these two criteria did not improve the predictive value of a single parameter. Both criteria showed multiple significant interactions with baseline patients' characteristics.
Only some of the commonly used response criteria predict outcome in patients undergoing CRT. The predictive value varies substantially across different criteria, with a higher sensitivity observed for the clinical parameters and a higher specificity observed for echocardiographic parameters. Combining various criteria adds little to their prognostic value. The predictive accuracy of various criteria can be different in various subgroups due to multiple interactions with baseline characteristics. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT00814840.
本研究旨在评估目前用于接受心脏再同步治疗(CRT)的患者的各种反应标准对结局的预测价值。
对接受心脏再同步治疗-除颤器(CRT-D)植入后存活 6 个月的 TRUST-CRT 随机试验中的数据进行了分析,该试验纳入了纽约心脏协会(NYHA)心功能分级 III-IV 级、QRS 波≥120ms、射血分数≤35%和机械不同步的患者。根据大多数既往试验中使用的 15 个标准,97 例患者被分为有反应者或无反应者。对分类后 1 年内主要不良心脏事件(MACE)的盲法判定数据进行分析,以计算反应标准的预测价值。在校正基线混杂变量后,只有 8 个标准对未来 MACE 有显著预测价值。临床(32%-94%和 26%-63%)和超声心动图(40%-93%和 22%-70%)标准的敏感性和特异性差异较大。最强的临床预测因素是 NYHA 心功能分级改善≥1 级[无反应者的校正相对风险(RR)为 4.41;95%置信区间(CI)为 1.75-11.04,P=0.002],而最强的超声心动图预测因素是左心室收缩末期指数降低≥15%(RR 3.49;95%CI 1.59-7.64,P=0.002)。这两个标准的联合并未提高单一参数的预测价值。两个标准均与基线患者特征存在多重显著交互作用。
目前常用的一些反应标准可预测 CRT 患者的结局。不同标准的预测价值差异较大,临床参数的敏感性较高,超声心动图参数的特异性较高。联合各种标准对其预后价值增加不大。由于与基线特征存在多重交互作用,不同亚组的各种标准的预测准确性可能不同。临床试验.gov 标识符:NCT00814840。