Therapeutics Initiative, Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology & Therapeutics, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Clin Ther. 2013 Apr;35(4):523-531.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2012.10.007. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
In the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), tiotropium bromide has a longer duration of action than ipratropium bromide; however, tiotropium bromide is a more expensive alternative treatment. At issue is whether tiotropium reduces the risk for hospital readmissions for COPD compared with ipratropium.
A population-based cohort study was conducted to assess whether tiotropium reduces the risk for hospital readmissions for COPD compared with ipratropium.
British Columbia (BC) linked provincial administrative health databases were used to identify new patients with COPD (aged ≥45 years) with a first hospital admission for COPD from 2003 to 2011. The study period was defined as the 30-day tiotropium or ipratropium treatment-initiation period after hospital discharge. Patients were followed up for ≤6 months from drug initiation to hospital readmission for COPD. In a subanalysis, the 2 treatment groups were matched on age, sex, and high-dimensional propensity scores derived from 200 empirically identified and predefined covariates. The risk for hospital readmission was estimated using multivariate Cox proportional hazards and logistic regression analyses.
In total, 3723 patients with COPD were dispensed tiotropium (n = 992) or ipratropium (n = 2731) within 30 days from the index hospital admission for COPD. The mean age of these patients was 72.8 years, and 50.8% were women. Tiotropium-treated patients were more likely to be in a higher income category and were more likely to use a greater number of medications compared with ipratropium-treated patients. Among the subset of 1500 matched patients, 215 (14.3%) were readmitted to hospital within 6 months. There was no statistically significant group difference in hospital readmissions using either analytical approach (hazard ratio = 0.98 [95% CI, 0.72-1.34]; odds ratio = 0.97 [95% CI, 0.70-1.36]).
In this select group of patients, neither tiotropium nor ipratropium was effective in significantly decreasing the risk for rehospitalization for COPD within 6 months.
在治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)时,噻托溴铵的作用持续时间长于异丙托溴铵;然而,噻托溴铵是一种更昂贵的替代治疗方法。问题是噻托溴铵是否比异丙托溴铵降低 COPD 的住院再入院风险。
进行一项基于人群的队列研究,以评估与异丙托溴铵相比,噻托溴铵是否降低 COPD 的住院再入院风险。
使用不列颠哥伦比亚省(BC)链接的省级行政健康数据库,确定 2003 年至 2011 年期间首次因 COPD 住院的新 COPD 患者(年龄≥45 岁)。研究期间定义为出院后噻托溴铵或异丙托溴铵治疗开始后 30 天的治疗期。从药物开始到 COPD 住院再入院的时间内,对患者进行≤6 个月的随访。在亚分析中,根据 200 个经验确定和预定义的协变量的高维倾向得分,对 2 个治疗组进行年龄、性别匹配。使用多变量 Cox 比例风险和 logistic 回归分析估计住院再入院的风险。
共有 3723 名 COPD 患者在 COPD 指数住院后 30 天内开出噻托溴铵(n=992)或异丙托溴铵(n=2731)。这些患者的平均年龄为 72.8 岁,其中 50.8%为女性。与异丙托溴铵治疗组相比,噻托溴铵治疗组更有可能处于较高收入类别,并且更有可能使用更多的药物。在 1500 名匹配患者的亚组中,215 名(14.3%)在 6 个月内再次住院。使用任何分析方法,两组在住院再入院方面均无统计学显著差异(风险比=0.98[95%CI,0.72-1.34];优势比=0.97[95%CI,0.70-1.36])。
在这组选定的患者中,噻托溴铵和异丙托溴铵均不能显著降低 6 个月内 COPD 再住院的风险。