Aliotta F, Gapiński J, Pochylski M, Ponterio R C, Saija F, Salvato G, Vasi C
CNR-IPCF, Laboratorio di Tecniche Spettroscopiche, Viale F. Stagno d'Alcontres 37, Messina IT-98158, Italy.
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2013 Feb;87(2):022303. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.87.022303. Epub 2013 Feb 4.
We performed a Brillouin scattering experiment on deeply supercooled water and compared the results with similar literature data obtained both at the same and at higher values of the exchanged wave vector. The whole set of available experimental data can be well reproduced with the use of the generalized hydrodynamic model where all the involved thermodynamic parameters are fixed to their literature values. On the contrary, the model based on the memory function approach generates the wrong estimates for measurables when the same values of the thermodynamic parameters are used. This result confirms our recent criticisms against the utilization of models originating from linear response theory [Phys. Rev. E 84, 051202 (2011)]. The inconsistency between models explains apparent discrepancies between the different conclusions on water acoustic behavior which may be found in the literature. We demonstrate that the observed behavior can be explained by assuming only a single relaxation process that is typical of any viscoelastic system. With all thermodynamics quantities fixed, the hydrodynamic description needs only two parameters to model the experimental data, namely, the relaxation time and the high-frequency limit of the sound velocity. The whole body of the experimental data can be well reproduced when the relaxation time behaves in an Arrhenian manner and the difference between the relaxed and not relaxed sound velocities is a constant. The high-frequency sound velocity is never higher than 2200 m/s. We conclude that, at least from experiments performed within the hydrodynamic regime, there is no indication for a fast sound close to the hypersonic velocity observed in ice.
我们对深度过冷水进行了布里渊散射实验,并将结果与在相同和更高交换波矢值下获得的类似文献数据进行了比较。利用广义流体动力学模型可以很好地再现所有可用的实验数据,其中所有涉及的热力学参数都固定为其文献值。相反,当使用相同的热力学参数值时,基于记忆函数方法的模型会对可测量值产生错误的估计。这一结果证实了我们最近对源于线性响应理论的模型应用的批评[《物理评论E》84, 051202 (2011)]。模型之间的不一致解释了文献中关于水声学行为的不同结论之间明显的差异。我们证明,观察到的行为可以通过假设只有一个任何粘弹性系统都具有的典型弛豫过程来解释。在所有热力学量固定的情况下,流体动力学描述只需要两个参数来对实验数据进行建模,即弛豫时间和声速的高频极限。当弛豫时间以阿仑尼乌斯方式变化且弛豫声速和未弛豫声速之间的差值为常数时,可以很好地再现整个实验数据集。高频声速从不高于2200米/秒。我们得出结论,至少从在流体动力学范围内进行的实验来看,没有迹象表明存在接近冰中观察到的高超音速的快声。