Suppr超能文献

与 5:1 按压通气比机械心肺复苏中持续按压通气相比,院外心脏骤停的生存结局得到改善。

Improved survival outcome with continuous chest compressions with ventilation compared to 5:1 compressions-to-ventilations mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

机构信息

Emergency Department, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.

出版信息

J Chin Med Assoc. 2013 Mar;76(3):158-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcma.2013.01.001. Epub 2013 Feb 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Fewer pauses and better chest compression quality are thought to improve overall survival following cardiac arrest. This study aimed to measure the outcomes of adult nontraumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCAs) treated with 5:1 compressions-to-ventilations (Thumper 1007) or continuous chest compressions with ventilation (Thumper 1008 CCV) mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) within a specified period of time.

METHODS

A retrospective observational cohort study of 515 adults with OHCA was conducted at the emergency department of an urban tertiary hospital. There were 307 patients in the Thumper 1007 phase (January 2008 to December 2009) and 208 patients in the Thumper 1008 CCV phase (January 2010 to May 2011). Return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and survival to hospital discharge were the primary outcome measures.

RESULTS

Patients in the Thumper 1007 and Thumper 1008 CCV phases had comparable results with the following exceptions: less hypertension (42.4% vs. 62.0%), cerebrovascular accidents (11.4% vs. 25.0%), and faster emergency medical service response time intervals (mean, 3.7 vs. 4.5 minutes) with the Thumper 1007. The average ambulance transport time was 6.1 minutes in both phases. The rates of ROSC [35.1% vs. 23.5%; adjusted odds ratio (OR), 1.616; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.073-2.432] and survival to hospital discharge (10.1% vs. 4.2%; adjusted OR 2.431; 95% CI, 1.154-5.120) were significantly higher with the Thumper 1008 CCV than with the Thumper 1007. Favorable neurologic outcome upon discharge, defined as cerebral performance category scores of 1 (good performance) or 2 (moderate disability), was not significantly different between the two phases [1.6% (5/307) vs. 1.9% (4/208); p = 0.802]. The Thumper 1008 CCV provided significantly faster average chest compression rates and shorter no-chest compression intervals than the Thumper 1007 after activation.

CONCLUSION

In an emergency department with short ambulance transport times, continuous chest compressions with ventilation through mechanical CPR showed improved outcomes, including ROSC and survival to hospital discharge, in an adult with OHCA. However, there are a variety of confounding influences that may affect the validity of conclusions that have been drawn.

摘要

背景

人们认为减少按压中断和提高胸外按压质量有助于提高心搏骤停后的整体存活率。本研究旨在测量在特定时间段内使用 5:1 按压-通气(Thumper 1007)或持续胸外按压并通气(Thumper 1008 CCV)机械心肺复苏(CPR)治疗的成人非创伤性院外心脏骤停(OHCA)的结果。

方法

对城市三级医院急诊科的 515 名 OHCA 成年患者进行了回顾性观察队列研究。Thumper 1007 阶段有 307 例患者(2008 年 1 月至 2009 年 12 月),Thumper 1008 CCV 阶段有 208 例患者(2010 年 1 月至 2011 年 5 月)。自主循环恢复(ROSC)和出院存活率是主要的观察指标。

结果

Thumper 1007 组和 Thumper 1008 CCV 组患者的结果相似,但存在以下差异:高血压的发生率较低(42.4% vs. 62.0%),脑血管意外的发生率较低(11.4% vs. 25.0%),Thumper 1007 的紧急医疗服务反应时间间隔较快(平均 3.7 分钟 vs. 4.5 分钟)。在两个阶段,救护车运输时间的平均时间均为 6.1 分钟。ROSC 的发生率[35.1% vs. 23.5%;调整后的比值比(OR),1.616;95%置信区间(CI),1.073-2.432]和出院存活率[10.1% vs. 4.2%;调整后的 OR,2.431;95%CI,1.154-5.120]在 Thumper 1008 CCV 组明显高于 Thumper 1007 组。出院时的良好神经功能结局(定义为脑功能状态评分 1 分(良好表现)或 2 分(中度残疾))在两个阶段之间没有显著差异[1.6%(5/307)vs. 1.9%(4/208);p=0.802]。在激活后,Thumper 1008 CCV 提供了显著更快的平均按压频率和更短的无按压间隔,而 Thumper 1007 则没有。

结论

在救护车运输时间较短的急诊科,通过机械 CPR 进行持续胸外按压并通气可提高成人 OHCA 的 ROSC 和出院存活率等结局。然而,有多种混杂因素可能影响已得出结论的有效性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验