• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

外部质量管理对基于工作场所的评估的影响。

The effects of external quality management on workplace-based assessment.

作者信息

Edwards Jill, Petra Hannah

机构信息

Oxford Deanery GP, Chipping Norton, Oxfordshire, UK.

出版信息

Educ Prim Care. 2013 Feb;24(2):105-10. doi: 10.1080/14739879.2013.11493464.

DOI:10.1080/14739879.2013.11493464
PMID:23498577
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In 2007 all medical specialty training curricula in the uK changed to become competence based, and Annual Review of Competence Progression (ARCP) panels became the mechanism for progression through training. The RCGP also developed an internet-based electronic portfolio to record trainees' learning and development. The operational instructions for the new specialty training curricula included the requirement for quality management of the decisions made by the ARCP panels.

METHODS

The Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) developed criteria to measure the quality of the decisions made by Deanery ARCP panels and the educational and clinical supervisors' reports that informed them. A team of external advisors (EAs) was appointed and trained to undertake this external scrutiny work.

RESULTS

For the past four years there has been a consistency in agreement between the decisions made by the Deanery ARCP teams and the EAs. The quality of both the educational and clinical supervisor reports has improved over the same time period.

CONCLUSION

An internet-based electronic portfolio is an essential component of competency-based curricula using programmes of assessment. Quality management is an effective strategy to ensure the dependability of high-stakes decisions. Feedback from the RCGP quality management process has provided a stimulus to promote change within deaneries.

摘要

背景

2007年,英国所有医学专业培训课程都转变为基于能力的课程,能力进展年度评审(ARCP)小组成为培训进程的推进机制。皇家全科医师学院(RCGP)还开发了一个基于互联网的电子档案袋,用于记录学员的学习与发展情况。新专业培训课程的操作指南包括对ARCP小组所做决策进行质量管理的要求。

方法

皇家全科医师学院制定了标准,以衡量地区ARCP小组所做决策以及为其提供信息的教育和临床督导报告的质量。任命并培训了一组外部顾问(EA)来开展这项外部审查工作。

结果

在过去四年里,地区ARCP小组和外部顾问所做决策之间的一致性保持稳定。在同一时期,教育和临床督导报告的质量都有所提高。

结论

基于互联网的电子档案袋是使用评估方案的基于能力课程的重要组成部分。质量管理是确保高风险决策可靠性的有效策略。RCGP质量管理过程的反馈推动了各地区的变革。

相似文献

1
The effects of external quality management on workplace-based assessment.外部质量管理对基于工作场所的评估的影响。
Educ Prim Care. 2013 Feb;24(2):105-10. doi: 10.1080/14739879.2013.11493464.
2
Perceptions of the Annual Review of Competence Progression (ARCP) in surgical training in the UK and Ireland: A prospective cross sectional questionnaire study.英国和爱尔兰外科培训中年度能力进展审查(ARCP)的认知:一项前瞻性横断面问卷调查研究。
Int J Surg. 2019 Jul;67:117-122. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.12.009. Epub 2018 Dec 22.
3
Annual review of competence: trainees' perspective.能力年度评估:学员视角
Clin Teach. 2013 Dec;10(6):394-8. doi: 10.1111/tct.12040.
4
'Putting it into words': developing the RCGP competency descriptors to include 'at-risk behaviours'.“用言语表达”:制定皇家全科医师学院能力描述以纳入“高危行为”
Educ Prim Care. 2012 Nov;23(6):404-21. doi: 10.1080/14739879.2012.11494152.
5
Evaluation of an established learning portfolio.对一个既定学习档案袋的评估。
Clin Teach. 2013 Feb;10(1):21-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-498X.2012.00599.x.
6
Revalidation for trainees and the annual review of competency progression (ARCP).重新认证培训生和年度能力进展审查(ARCP)。
Clin Med (Lond). 2013 Dec;13(6):570-2. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.13-6-570.
7
What is wrong with assessment in postgraduate training? Lessons from clinical practice and educational research.研究生培训评估出了什么问题?来自临床实践和教育研究的教训。
Med Teach. 2013 Jul;35(7):569-74. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.798403. Epub 2013 May 23.
8
Evaluating competence using a portfolio: a literature review and web-based application to the ACGME competencies.使用档案袋评估能力:文献综述及基于网络的美国毕业后医学教育认证委员会能力应用
Teach Learn Med. 2004 Fall;16(4):381-7. doi: 10.1207/s15328015tlm1604_13.
9
Ensuring quality in postgraduate medical education: competency testing is the key.确保研究生医学教育质量:能力测试是关键。
Virchows Arch. 2016 Jan;468(1):115-9. doi: 10.1007/s00428-015-1847-z. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
10
Are we generating more assessments without added value? Surgical trainees' perceptions of and receptiveness to cross-specialty assessment.我们是否在生成更多没有附加值的评估?外科学员对跨专业评估的看法和接受程度。
Perspect Med Educ. 2020 Aug;9(4):201-209. doi: 10.1007/s40037-020-00594-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing professional competence: a critical review of the Annual Review of Competence Progression.评估专业能力:《年度能力进展审查》的批判性回顾。
J R Soc Med. 2019 Jun;112(6):236-244. doi: 10.1177/0141076819848113. Epub 2019 May 24.