Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Service of Biomedicine, Department of Laboratories, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Ther Drug Monit. 2013 Apr;35(2):150-67. doi: 10.1097/FTD.0b013e318284ef11.
Several population pharmacokinetic (PPK) analyses of the anticancer drug imatinib have been performed to investigate different patient populations and covariate effects. The present analysis offers a systematic qualitative and quantitative summary and comparison of those. Its primary objective was to provide useful information for evaluating the expectedness of imatinib plasma concentration measurements in the frame of therapeutic drug monitoring. The secondary objective was to review clinically important concentration-effect relationships to provide help in evaluating the potential suitability of plasma concentration values. Nine PPK models describing total imatinib plasma concentration were identified. Parameter estimates were standardized to common covariate values whenever possible. Predicted median exposure (C min) was derived by simulations and ranged between models from 555 to 1388 ng/mL (grand median: 870 ng/mL and interquartile "reference" range: 520-1390 ng/mL). Covariates of potential clinical importance (up to 30% change in pharmacokinetic predicted by at least 1 model) included body weight, albumin, α1 acid glycoprotein, and white blood cell count. Various other covariates were included but were statistically not significant or seemed clinically less important or physiologically controversial. Concentration-response relationships had more importance below the average reference range and concentration-toxicity relationships above. Therapeutic drug monitoring-guided dosage adjustment seems justified for imatinib, but a formal predictive therapeutic range remains difficult to propose in the absence of prospective target concentration intervention trials. To evaluate the expectedness of a drug concentration measurement in practice, this review allows comparison of the measurement either to the average reference range or to a specific range accounting for individual patient characteristics. For future research, external PPK model validation or meta-model development should be considered.
已经进行了几项关于抗癌药物伊马替尼的群体药代动力学(PPK)分析,以研究不同的患者人群和协变量的影响。本分析提供了对这些分析的系统定性和定量总结和比较。其主要目的是提供有用的信息,以评估治疗药物监测框架中伊马替尼血浆浓度测量的预期性。次要目的是审查临床重要的浓度-效应关系,以帮助评估血浆浓度值的潜在适用性。确定了 9 个描述总伊马替尼血浆浓度的 PPK 模型。只要有可能,就将参数估计标准化为常见协变量值。通过模拟得出预测的中位数暴露(Cmin),范围在各模型之间为 555 至 1388ng/ml(总体中位数:870ng/ml,四分位“参考”范围:520-1390ng/ml)。具有潜在临床重要性的协变量(至少 1 个模型预测的药代动力学变化达 30%)包括体重、白蛋白、α1酸性糖蛋白和白细胞计数。还包括其他各种协变量,但统计学上不显著或临床上不太重要或生理上存在争议。在平均参考范围以下和浓度-毒性关系以上,浓度-反应关系更为重要。治疗药物监测指导剂量调整似乎对伊马替尼是合理的,但在缺乏前瞻性目标浓度干预试验的情况下,很难提出正式的预测治疗范围。为了在实践中评估药物浓度测量的预期性,本综述允许将测量值与平均参考范围或特定范围进行比较,该范围考虑了个体患者特征。对于未来的研究,应考虑外部 PPK 模型验证或元模型开发。