Suppr超能文献

调整 DLCO 以适应 Hb 及其对造血细胞移植特异性合并症指数的影响。

Adjusting DLCO for Hb and its effects on the Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation-specific Comorbidity Index.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Colorado-Denver, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.

出版信息

Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013 Sep;48(9):1253-6. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2013.31. Epub 2013 Mar 18.

Abstract

The Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation-specific Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI) is used to counsel patients regarding the risk of transplantation and selection of conditioning regimens. Pulmonary disease, most frequently demonstrated by a decreased diffusion capacity of carbon monoxide (DLCO), is the most prevalent comorbidity captured by the HCT-CI. The HCT-CI was validated using the Dinakara method for adjusting DLCO for Hb, but our institution and others utilize the Cotes method. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of using the Cotes method rather than the Dinakara method on the HCT-CI score. We reviewed pre-transplant pulmonary function tests in 73 patients who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic SCT. Patients were stratified into low, intermediate or high-risk groups based on HCT-CI scores of 0, 1-2 or 3, respectively. We found that compared with the Dinakara method, the Cotes method increased the HCT-CI score in 45% of patients and resulted in total HCT-CI scores predictive of higher non-relapse mortality in 33% of patients. These results indicate that if an institution uses the Cotes method to adjust DLCO for Hb, their patients may be counseled to expect a higher risk of mortality than is actually predicted by the HCT-CI, and may be excluded from transplantation. Therefore, unless the HCT-CI is validated using other methods for correcting DLCO for Hb, the Dinakara method should be used.

摘要

造血细胞移植特异性合并症指数(HCT-CI)用于向患者提供有关移植风险和预处理方案选择的咨询。肺部疾病,最常通过一氧化碳弥散量(DLCO)降低来表现,是 HCT-CI 所捕获的最常见的合并症。HCT-CI 使用 Dinakara 方法对 DLCO 进行血红蛋白校正进行了验证,但我们机构和其他机构使用 Cotes 方法。本研究的目的是确定使用 Cotes 方法而不是使用 Dinakara 方法对 HCT-CI 评分的影响。我们回顾了 73 例接受异基因造血 SCT 的患者的移植前肺功能检查。根据 HCT-CI 评分将患者分为低危、中危或高危组,分别为 0、1-2 或 3。我们发现,与 Dinakara 方法相比,Cotes 方法使 45%的患者的 HCT-CI 评分增加,导致 33%的患者的总 HCT-CI 评分预测非复发死亡率更高。这些结果表明,如果机构使用 Cotes 方法对血红蛋白校正 DLCO,则可能会向患者提供比 HCT-CI 实际预测的更高的死亡率风险,并可能被排除在移植之外。因此,除非使用其他方法对血红蛋白校正 DLCO 进行验证,否则应使用 Dinakara 方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验