Division of Hematology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2013 Aug;19(8):1167-74. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2013.05.001. Epub 2013 May 7.
Although reduced-intensity conditioning has become standard of care for patients with hematologic malignancies undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), the optimum regimen has yet to be defined, and may depend on pretransplantation patient- and/or disease-specific risk factors. We report here results in 100 adults, ages 18 to 69, with high-risk hematologic malignancy who received conditioning with fludarabine, carmustine, melphalan, and rabbit antithymocyte globulin (FBM-A). Outcomes were stratified using the disease risk index (DRI) as published by Armand et al. (Blood 2012;120:905-913). Median age was 56, and patients were ineligible for standard myeloablative conditioning because of age, organ dysfunction, or prior autologous HCT. Patients underwent transplantation for myeloid (acute myelogenous leukemia, n = 40; myelodysplastic syndrome, n = 24; myelofibrosis, n = 13; other myeloid, n = 2) or lymphoid (acute lymphoblastic leukemia, n = 8; non-Hodgkin lymphoma, n = 8; Hodgkin lymphoma, n = 4, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, n = 1) malignancy. Donors were related in 26 patients (22 matched, 4 mismatched at 1 antigen) and unrelated in 74 (mismatched at 1 or 2 HLA loci in 33); grafts were peripheral blood stem cells in 97 patients, bone marrow in 2, and double cord in 1. According to the DRI, 68 patients were classified as low (n = 1) or intermediate risk (n = 67), and 32 were classified as high (n = 28) or very high risk (n = 4). With a median follow-up of surviving patients of 18 months, the Kaplan-Meier estimate of overall survival at 2 years for patients in the low/intermediate risk group is 80%, compared with 66% in the high/very high group (P = .11). Two-year cumulative incidence of relapse and nonrelapse mortality in the low/intermediate group are 9.9% and 15%, versus 25% and 19% in the high/very high group (respective P values .07 and .81). The cumulative incidence of acute graft-versus-host (GVHD) grades III to IV at 100 days was 8.1%, and the incidence of National Institutes of Health-defined moderate to severe chronic GVHD was 22% at 2 years. No deaths were attributable to chronic GVHD. Survival was not influenced by age, hematopoietic comorbidity index score, donor type, donor gender, or presence of mismatch. We conclude that FBM-A is an effective and safe conditioning regimen for adults up to age 69 with hematologic malignancies who have low-, intermediate-, or high-risk scores according to the DRI.
尽管对于接受异基因造血细胞移植(HCT)的血液系统恶性肿瘤患者,降低强度的预处理已成为标准治疗方法,但最佳方案尚未确定,并且可能取决于移植前患者和/或疾病特异性的风险因素。我们在此报告了 100 例年龄在 18 至 69 岁之间、患有高危血液系统恶性肿瘤的成年人接受氟达拉滨、卡莫司汀、马法兰和兔抗胸腺细胞球蛋白(FBM-A)预处理的结果。结果根据 Armand 等人发表的疾病风险指数(DRI)进行分层(Blood 2012;120:905-913)。中位年龄为 56 岁,由于年龄、器官功能障碍或先前的自体 HCT,这些患者不符合标准的骨髓清除性预处理条件。患者因髓系(急性髓系白血病,n=40;骨髓增生异常综合征,n=24;骨髓纤维化,n=13;其他髓系,n=2)或淋巴系(急性淋巴细胞白血病,n=8;非霍奇金淋巴瘤,n=8;霍奇金淋巴瘤,n=4,慢性淋巴细胞白血病,n=1)恶性肿瘤而接受移植。26 例患者为亲缘供者(22 例匹配,4 例 1 个抗原不匹配),74 例为无关供者(33 例 HLA 位点 1 或 2 不匹配);97 例患者接受外周血造血干细胞移植,2 例接受骨髓移植,1 例接受双脐带血移植。根据 DRI,68 例患者被分类为低危(n=1)或中危(n=67),32 例患者被分类为高危(n=28)或极高危(n=4)。在中位随访时间为存活患者 18 个月时,低/中危组患者的 2 年总生存率的 Kaplan-Meier 估计值为 80%,而高/极高危组为 66%(P=0.11)。低/中危组的 2 年累积复发率和非复发死亡率分别为 9.9%和 15%,而高/极高危组分别为 25%和 19%(相应的 P 值分别为 0.07 和 0.81)。100 天时急性移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)III 至 IV 级的累积发生率为 8.1%,2 年时美国国立卫生研究院定义的中度至重度慢性 GVHD 的发生率为 22%。没有死亡归因于慢性 GVHD。年龄、造血系统合并症指数评分、供者类型、供者性别或不匹配均不影响生存。我们得出结论,对于年龄在 69 岁以下、根据 DRI 评分患有低危、中危或高危血液系统恶性肿瘤的成年人,FBM-A 是一种有效且安全的预处理方案。