Suppr超能文献

左乙拉西坦、卡马西平和丙戊酸钠对癫痫患者P100和P300的影响。

The effects of levetiracetam, carbamazepine, and sodium valproate on P100 and P300 in epileptic patients.

作者信息

Tumay Yener, Altun Yaşar, Ekmekci Kazm, Ozkul Yasar

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Medical Faculty, Harran University, Sanliurfa, Turkey.

出版信息

Clin Neuropharmacol. 2013 Mar-Apr;36(2):55-8. doi: 10.1097/WNF.0b013e318285f3da.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Although the unfavorable effects of early antiepileptic drugs, valproic acid, and carbamazepine (CBZ) on cognitive functions and visual functions have been investigated, the unfavorable effects of levetiracetam (LEV) on cognitive and visual functions remain unknown. The aim of the present study is to investigate whether there is a difference between the adverse effects by comparing the P300 and P100 latencies of LEV with epileptic patients using CBZ or sodium valproate (VPA) and healthy subjects.

METHOD

A control group of 20 healthy subjects and 53 patients receiving monotherapy with CBZ (n = 15), VPA (n = 14), and LEV (n = 24) who admitted to neurology policlinic for investigation and treatment were enrolled in this study. Visual evoked potentials and event-related evoked potentials were studied according to these groups. Standard "oddball paradigm" (unpredictable stimuli series) was used to obtain P300.

RESULTS

The P300 latencies of epileptic patients receiving CBZ, VPA, and LEV were longer compared with the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P = 0.001, 0.001, and 0.03, respectively). The P300 latency of patients receiving LEV was significantly shorter than the group receiving CBZ and VPA with statistically significant difference (P < 0.01 for both). The P300 amplitude was lower in the groups receiving CBZ, VPA, and LEV compared with the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study shows that LEV disrupts P300 latency less than VPA and CBZ and does not prolong P100 as much as them.

摘要

目的

尽管已对早期抗癫痫药物丙戊酸和卡马西平(CBZ)对认知功能和视觉功能的不良影响进行了研究,但左乙拉西坦(LEV)对认知和视觉功能的不良影响仍不清楚。本研究的目的是通过比较使用CBZ或丙戊酸钠(VPA)的癫痫患者及健康受试者与使用LEV的癫痫患者的P300和P100潜伏期,来研究不良反应之间是否存在差异。

方法

本研究纳入了20名健康受试者作为对照组,以及53名因调查和治疗而入住神经内科门诊的患者,这些患者分别接受CBZ单药治疗(n = 15)、VPA单药治疗(n = 14)和LEV单药治疗(n = 24)。根据这些分组对视觉诱发电位和事件相关诱发电位进行研究。采用标准的“oddball范式”(不可预测刺激序列)来获取P300。

结果

与对照组相比,接受CBZ、VPA和LEV治疗的癫痫患者的P300潜伏期更长,差异具有统计学意义(分别为P = 0.001、0.001和0.03)。接受LEV治疗的患者的P300潜伏期显著短于接受CBZ和VPA治疗的组,差异具有统计学意义(两者均P < 0.01)。与对照组相比,接受CBZ、VPA和LEV治疗的组的P300波幅更低,差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。

结论

本研究表明,LEV对P300潜伏期的干扰小于VPA和CBZ,且对P100的延长也不如它们。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验