2nd Department of Pathology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013 Apr;138(3):691-8. doi: 10.1007/s10549-013-2475-4. Epub 2013 Mar 17.
The goal of this study was to assess the prognostic value of a 3-gene (TOP2A, FOXM1, and MKI67) proliferation score and use it to risk stratify grade-2, estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancers into low- and high-risk groups. We used 4 different breast cancer gene expression datasets including two cohorts of patients who received no systemic adjuvant therapy (Mainz: n = 206, TRANSBIG: n = 134) and two other cohorts that received adjuvant tamoxifen (JBI: n = 227, MDACC/SET: n = 192). We compared individual and combined expression values of the 3 genes between grade 1, 2, and 3 tumors and plotted distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) curves by the 3-gene score for grade-2 cancers. We compared the prognostic value of the 3-gene score to the Genomic Grade Index (GGI). The individual and combined expression of TOP2A, FOXM1, and MKI67 were significantly different between the 3 histological grade groups with the highest expression in grade-3 and the lowest in grade-1 cancers. Expression levels were variable in grade-2 cancers. Grade-2 tumors with high expression of the 3 genes (>median) showed significantly worse DMFS in one prognostic and one tamoxifen-treated set and showed a similar but non-significant trend for worse survival in the remaining two datasets. The 3-gene score performed equally well in risk stratification as the GGI. A 3-gene proliferation score shows similar prognostic value as the GGI in ER-positive, grade-2 cancers and may serve as basis for a PCR-based assay that could aid prognostic prediction for clinically intermediate-risk cancers.
本研究旨在评估三基因(TOP2A、FOXM1 和 MKI67)增殖评分的预后价值,并将其用于风险分层,将雌激素受体(ER)阳性、2 级乳腺癌分为低风险和高风险组。我们使用了 4 个不同的乳腺癌基因表达数据集,包括两个未接受系统辅助治疗的患者队列(美因茨:n = 206,TRANSBIG:n = 134)和另外两个接受辅助他莫昔芬治疗的队列(JBI:n = 227,MDACC/SET:n = 192)。我们比较了 1 级、2 级和 3 级肿瘤中 3 个基因的单独和联合表达值,并根据 3 级肿瘤的 3 基因评分绘制远处无复发生存(DMFS)曲线。我们比较了 3 基因评分与基因组分级指数(GGI)的预后价值。TOP2A、FOXM1 和 MKI67 的单独和联合表达在 3 个组织学分级组之间存在显著差异,3 级肿瘤的表达最高,1 级肿瘤的表达最低。2 级肿瘤的表达水平存在差异。3 个基因高表达(>中位数)的 2 级肿瘤在一个预后和一个接受他莫昔芬治疗的队列中显示出明显较差的 DMFS,在其余两个数据集中显示出相似但无统计学意义的生存较差趋势。3 基因评分在风险分层方面的表现与 GGI 相当。3 基因增殖评分在 ER 阳性、2 级癌症中的预后价值与 GGI 相似,可能为基于 PCR 的检测提供基础,有助于预测临床中危癌症的预后。