Department of Asthma, Allergy and Respiratory Science, King's College London School of Medicine, London, UK.
Exp Physiol. 2013 Jul;98(7):1190-8. doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.2012.071415. Epub 2013 Mar 15.
Understanding the effects of respiratory load on neural respiratory drive and respiratory pattern are key to understanding the regulation of load compensation in respiratory disease. The aim of the study was to examine and compare the recruitment pattern of the diaphragm and parasternal intercostal muscles when the respiratory system was loaded using two methods. Twelve subjects performed incremental inspiratory threshold loading up to 50% of their maximal inspiratory pressure, and 10 subjects underwent incremental, steady-state hypercapnia to a maximal inspired CO2 of 5%. The diaphragmatic electromyogram (EMGdi) was measured using a multipair oesophageal catheter, and the parasternal intercostal muscle EMG (sEMGpara) was recorded from bipolar surface electrodes positioned in the second intercostal space. The EMGdi and sEMGpara were analysed over the last minute of each increment of both protocols, normalized using the peak EMG recorded during maximal respiratory manoeuvres and expressed as EMG%max. The EMGdi%max and sEMGpara%max increased in parallel during the two loading methods, although EMGdi%max was consistently greater than sEMGpara%max in both conditions, inspiratory threshold loading [bias (SD) 9 (3)%, 95% limits of agreement 4-15%] and hypercapnia [bias (SD) 6 (3)%, 95% limits of agreement -0.05 to 12%]. Inspiratory threshold loading resulted in more pronounced increases in mean (SD) EMGdi%max [10 (7)-45 (28)%] and sEMGpara%max [5.3 (3.1)-40 (28)%] from baseline compared with EMGdi%max [7 (4)-21 (8)%] and sEMGpara%max [4.7 (2.3)-10 (4)%] during hypercapnia, despite comparable levels of ventilation. These data support the use of sEMGpara%max, as a non-invasive alternative to EMGdi%max recorded with an invasive oesophageal electrode catheter, for the quantification of neural respiratory drive. This technique should make evaluation of respiratory muscle function easier to undertake and therefore more readily acceptable in patients with respiratory disease, in whom transduction of neural respiratory drive to pressure generation can be compromised.
了解呼吸负荷对神经呼吸驱动和呼吸模式的影响,是理解呼吸疾病中负荷补偿调节的关键。本研究旨在通过两种方法比较和探讨呼吸系统负荷时膈肌和胸肋部肋间肌的募集模式。12 名受试者递增递增吸气阈负荷,直至达到最大吸气压力的 50%,10 名受试者递增至稳态高碳酸血症,使吸入 CO2 达到最大 5%。使用多对食管导管测量膈肌肌电图(EMGdi),并使用双极表面电极记录第二肋间的胸肋部肋间肌肌电图(sEMGpara)。两种方案的最后 1 分钟内,对 EMGdi 和 sEMGpara 进行分析,采用最大呼吸动作时记录的峰值 EMG 进行归一化,并表示为 EMG%max。两种负荷方式下,EMGdi%max 和 sEMGpara%max 呈平行增加,尽管在两种情况下,EMGdi%max 始终大于 sEMGpara%max,即吸气阈负荷[偏倚(SD)9(3)%,95%可信区间 4-15%]和高碳酸血症[偏倚(SD)6(3)%,95%可信区间 -0.05 至 12%]。与高碳酸血症相比,吸气阈负荷导致 EMGdi%max[10(7)-45(28)%]和 sEMGpara%max[5.3(3.1)-40(28)%]的平均(SD)增加更明显,而 EMGdi%max[7(4)-21(8)%]和 sEMGpara%max[4.7(2.3)-10(4)%]从基线开始,尽管通气水平相当。这些数据支持使用 sEMGpara%max 作为替代侵入性食管电极导管记录的 EMGdi%max 的非侵入性方法,用于定量神经呼吸驱动。该技术应该使呼吸肌功能的评估更容易进行,因此在呼吸疾病患者中更容易被接受,在这些患者中,神经呼吸驱动到压力产生的转换可能会受到影响。