Suppr超能文献

实时聚合酶链反应检测耐万古霉素肠球菌的新方法及其与其他方法的比较。

A new approach of real time polymerase chain reaction in detection of vancomycin-resistant enterococci and its comparison with other methods.

作者信息

Tripathi A, Shukla S K, Singh A, Prasad K N

机构信息

Department of Microbiology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India.

出版信息

Indian J Med Microbiol. 2013 Jan-Mar;31(1):47-52. doi: 10.4103/0255-0857.108721.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) are third leading cause of nosocomial infection. Therefore, an effective, accurate and early detection of VRE along with their minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) is required to initiate appropriate therapy and thus better patient outcome.

OBJECTIVE

To detect VRE by real time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (Q-PCR) and to compare the results with chrom ID (C-ID) VRE and PCR. Further the study also determined the fold change of vanA gene by Q-PCR in different groups of VRE isolates classified on the basis of glycopeptides MIC range.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

A total of 145 (80 VRE and 65 vancomycin-susceptible enterococci) clinical isolates were included in the study. After the screening of VRE isolates MICs were determined by E-test and agar dilution method. Further VRE was confirmed by vanA and vanB specific PCR and Q-PCR.

RESULTS

The sensitivity and specificity of C-ID VRE was 100% and 95.38%. However, sensitivity and specificity of conventional and Q-PCR were found to be 100%. Conventional and Q-PCR confirmed that our all isolates were vanA type. Mean R value was significantly higher ( P < 0.001) in group I (MIC > 1024 μg/ml) when compared to group II (MIC 512-1024 μg/ml) and group III (MIC < 512 μg/ml) isolates. The mean R was also significantly higher in group II when compared to group III isolates ( P = 0.038).

CONCLUSION

Q-PCR is a rapid technique to detect vanA in enterococci along with their MIC range, thus it might be helpful to decide the treatment modalities of infections caused by VRE.

摘要

背景

耐万古霉素肠球菌(VRE)是医院感染的第三大主要病因。因此,需要有效、准确且早期地检测VRE及其最低抑菌浓度(MIC),以便启动适当的治疗并改善患者预后。

目的

通过实时定量聚合酶链反应(Q-PCR)检测VRE,并将结果与显色ID(C-ID)VRE和PCR进行比较。此外,该研究还通过Q-PCR确定了基于糖肽MIC范围分类的不同VRE分离株组中vanA基因的变化倍数。

对象与方法

本研究共纳入145株临床分离株(80株VRE和65株万古霉素敏感肠球菌)。筛选出VRE分离株后,通过E-test和琼脂稀释法测定MIC。进一步通过vanA和vanB特异性PCR及Q-PCR确认VRE。

结果

C-ID VRE的敏感性和特异性分别为100%和95.38%。然而,常规PCR和Q-PCR的敏感性和特异性均为100%。常规PCR和Q-PCR证实我们所有的分离株均为vanA型。与第二组(MIC为512 - 1024μg/ml)和第三组(MIC < 512μg/ml)分离株相比,第一组(MIC > 1024μg/ml)的平均R值显著更高(P < 0.001)。与第三组分离株相比,第二组的平均R值也显著更高(P = 0.038)。

结论

Q-PCR是一种快速检测肠球菌中vanA及其MIC范围的技术,因此可能有助于确定由VRE引起的感染的治疗方式。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验