Conradi M, Groenier K, Hutten J, Schuling J, Tijmstra T, Meyboom-de Jong B
Department af General Practice, University af Groningen, The Netherlands.
Int J Risk Saf Med. 1996;8(3):225-30. doi: 10.3233/JRS-1996-8305.
On basis of secondary analysis of data obtained from the 'Dutch National Survey of Morbidity and Intervention in General Practice', we tried to gain insight into the nature and extent of iatrogenic illnesses in general practice. In this registration project 386,000 contacts of patients with 161 GP's have been recorded, using the International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC). We confined ourselves to 'side effects of medication' and 'complications of medical treatment'. It appears that in two percent of all contacts the GP has made one of these two diagnoses, or has considered these. On average, the patients concerned suffered twice more often serious invalidating or danger of life.Herewith these two groups of iatrogenic harm constitute an important problem in general practice.
基于对“荷兰全科医疗中发病率与干预的全国性调查”所获数据的二次分析,我们试图深入了解全科医疗中医源性疾病的性质和程度。在这个登记项目中,已使用国际初级保健分类法(ICPC)记录了患者与161名全科医生的38.6万次接触。我们将范围限定在“药物副作用”和“医疗并发症”。结果显示,在所有接触中,有2%的情况全科医生做出了这两种诊断之一,或者考虑过这些情况。平均而言,相关患者出现严重致残或生命危险的频率要高出一倍。因此,这两组医源性伤害在全科医疗中构成了一个重要问题。