• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Why calls for more routine carotid stenting are currently inappropriate: an international, multispecialty, expert review and position statement.

作者信息

Abbott Anne L, Adelman Mark A, Alexandrov Andrei V, Barber P Alan, Barnett Henry J M, Beard Jonathan, Bell Peter, Björck Martin, Blacker David, Bonati Leo H, Brown Martin M, Buckley Clifford J, Cambria Richard P, Castaldo John E, Comerota Anthony J, Connolly E Sander, Dalman Ronald L, Davies Alun H, Eckstein Hans-Henning, Faruqi Rishad, Feasby Thomas E, Fraedrich Gustav, Gloviczki Peter, Hankey Graeme J, Harbaugh Robert E, Heldenberg Eitan, Hennerici Michael G, Hill Michael D, Kleinig Timothy J, Mikhailidis Dimitri P, Moore Wesley S, Naylor Ross, Nicolaides Andrew, Paraskevas Kosmas I, Pelz David M, Prichard James W, Purdie Grant, Ricco Jean-Baptiste, Ringleb Peter A, Riles Thomas, Rothwell Peter M, Sandercock Peter, Sillesen Henrik, Spence J David, Spinelli Francesco, Sturm Jonathon, Tan Aaron, Thapar Ankur, Veith Frank J, Wijeratne Tissa, Zhou Wei

机构信息

School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, The Alfred Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Stroke. 2013 Apr;44(4):1186-90. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.000261. Epub 2013 Mar 19.

DOI:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.000261
PMID:23512977
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Why calls for more routine carotid stenting are currently inappropriate: an international, multispecialty, expert review and position statement.为何目前呼吁更多常规颈动脉支架置入术并不恰当：一项国际多专业专家综述与立场声明
Stroke. 2013 Apr;44(4):1186-90. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.000261. Epub 2013 Mar 19.
2
Why the United States Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) should not extend reimbursement indications for carotid artery angioplasty/stenting.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2012 Mar;43(3):247-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2011.12.006. Epub 2012 Jan 5.
3
Carotid revascularization using endarterectomy or stenting systems (CaRESS): 4-year outcomes.使用颈动脉内膜切除术或支架置入系统进行颈动脉血运重建（CaRESS）：4年随访结果
J Endovasc Ther. 2009 Aug;16(4):397-409. doi: 10.1583/08-2685.1.
4
CREST-2: Identifying the Best Method of Stroke Prevention for Carotid Artery Stenosis: National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Organizational Update.CREST-2：确定颈动脉狭窄最佳卒中预防方法：美国国立神经疾病和中风研究所组织更新
Stroke. 2017 May;48(5):e130-e131. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.016051. Epub 2017 Apr 6.
5
Endarterectomy or carotid artery stenting: the quest continues.动脉内膜切除术或颈动脉支架置入术：探索仍在继续。
Am J Surg. 2008 Feb;195(2):259-69. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.07.022.
6
Carotid revascularization to prevent stroke.颈动脉血运重建预防卒中。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2012 Mar;43(3):252-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2011.12.014. Epub 2012 Jan 10.
7
Carotid endarterectomy versus stenting: an international perspective.
Stroke. 2006 Feb;37(2):344; author reply 344. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000199664.59711.21. Epub 2006 Jan 5.
8
Carotid Disease Management: Surgery, Stenting, or Medication.颈动脉疾病管理：手术、支架置入术或药物治疗。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2015 Sep;17(9):625. doi: 10.1007/s11886-015-0625-5.
9
Regarding "A new approach to carotid angioplasty and stenting with transcervial occlusion and protective shunting: why it may be a better carotid artery intervention".
J Vasc Surg. 2004 Nov;40(5):1062. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2004.07.046.
10
Protected carotid artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients reflections from SAPPHIRE.
Stroke. 2005 Apr;36(4):912-3. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000161706.31557.55. Epub 2005 Mar 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Extra-Cranial Carotid Artery Stenosis: An Objective Analysis of the Available Evidence.颅外颈动脉狭窄：现有证据的客观分析
Front Neurol. 2022 Jun 21;13:739999. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.739999. eCollection 2022.
2
Review of imaging biomarkers for the vulnerable carotid plaque.易损性颈动脉斑块的影像学生物标志物综述。
JVS Vasc Sci. 2021 May 15;2:149-158. doi: 10.1016/j.jvssci.2021.03.001. eCollection 2021.
3
Roadmap Consensus on Carotid Artery Plaque Imaging and Impact on Therapy Strategies and Guidelines: An International, Multispecialty, Expert Review and Position Statement.
颈动脉斑块成像的路线图共识及其对治疗策略和指南的影响：国际多学科专家评论和立场声明。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2021 Sep;42(9):1566-1575. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A7223. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
4
Transatlantic Differences in Management of Carotid Stenosis: BRIDGing the Gap in StrokE Management (BRIDGE) Project.颈动脉狭窄管理中的跨大西洋差异：弥合卒中管理差距（BRIDGE）项目
Neurohospitalist. 2018 Jul;8(3):113-123. doi: 10.1177/1941874417747772. Epub 2018 Jan 17.
5
National Patterns of Carotid Revascularization Before and After the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy vs Stenting Trial (CREST).颈动脉内膜切除术与支架置入术试验（CREST）前后颈动脉血运重建的国家模式。
JAMA Neurol. 2018 Jan 1;75(1):51-57. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.3496.
6
Physician specialty and variation in carotid revascularization technique selected for Medicare patients.医师专业与为医疗保险患者选择的颈动脉血运重建技术的差异。
J Vasc Surg. 2016 Jan;63(1):89-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.08.068. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
7
Bias in the use of randomized trials for carotid stenosis management.颈动脉狭窄治疗中随机试验使用的偏倚
Gefasschirurgie. 2015;20(4):252-257. doi: 10.1007/s00772-015-0036-3.
8
Contralateral occlusion increases the risk of neurological complications associated with carotid endarterectomy.对侧闭塞会增加与颈动脉内膜切除术相关的神经并发症风险。
Int J Vasc Med. 2015;2015:942146. doi: 10.1155/2015/942146. Epub 2015 Jan 29.
9
Impact of coexisting coronary artery disease on the occurrence of cerebral ischemic lesions after carotid stenting.并存冠状动脉疾病对颈动脉支架置入术后脑缺血性病变发生的影响。
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 14;9(4):e94280. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094280. eCollection 2014.
10
Personalised medicine, disease prevention, and the inverse care law: more harm than benefit?个性化医疗、疾病预防与逆医疗法则：弊大于利？
Eur J Epidemiol. 2014 Jun;29(6):383-90. doi: 10.1007/s10654-014-9898-z. Epub 2014 Apr 12.