Department of Oral Sciences, University of Otago, 310 great King Street, Dunedin, 9016, New Zealand.
Br Dent J. 2013 Mar;214(6):281-3. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2013.272.
Dental meetings are one of the most important resources for disseminating knowledge to dental practitioners. Therefore, the information provided in such meetings should be as unbiased as possible. This paper assessed whether major general dentistry and periodontology/implant dentistry meetings have guidelines for reporting scientific evidence in oral lectures and seminars. The homepages of seven dental meetings (EUROPERIO, AAP, EAO, AO, IADR, ADA, and FDI) were assessed to check for guidelines for presenting scientific data in oral lectures and seminars, according to defined criteria. Only three of these dental meetings reported information for presentations on their homepages, although these guidelines were related to technical issues rather than recommendations for the presentation of scientific data. The present paper suggests guidelines for reporting scientific evidence in oral lectures and seminars in dental meetings to improve the current standards of reporting. High standards of reporting may provide less biased information, which is necessary for dental practitioners and clinicians to make accurate judgements on the efficacy/effectiveness of therapies.
牙科会议是向牙科从业者传播知识的最重要资源之一。因此,此类会议提供的信息应尽可能保持客观。本文评估了普通牙科学和牙周病学/种植学会议是否有报告口腔讲座和研讨会中科学证据的指导方针。根据既定标准,评估了七个牙科会议(EUROPERIO、AAP、EAO、AO、IADR、ADA 和 FDI)的主页,以检查是否有在口腔讲座和研讨会上呈现科学数据的指导方针。尽管这些指南与技术问题有关,而不是与呈现科学数据的建议有关,但其中只有三个牙科会议在其主页上报告了演讲的信息。本文提出了在牙科会议中报告口腔讲座和研讨会中科学证据的指导方针,以提高目前的报告标准。高标准的报告可以提供更客观的信息,这对于牙科从业者和临床医生在治疗效果方面做出准确判断是必要的。