Suppr超能文献

DCCT/EDIC 研究中强化与常规治疗及血糖史对 1 型糖尿病患者心功能的影响。

Effects of prior intensive versus conventional therapy and history of glycemia on cardiac function in type 1 diabetes in the DCCT/EDIC.

机构信息

Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.

出版信息

Diabetes. 2013 Oct;62(10):3561-9. doi: 10.2337/db12-0546. Epub 2013 Mar 21.

Abstract

Intensive diabetes therapy reduces the prevalence of coronary calcification and progression of atherosclerosis and the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) events in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT)/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC) study. The effects of intensive therapy on measures of cardiac function and structure and their association with glycemia have not been explored in type 1 diabetes (T1DM). We assess whether intensive treatment compared with conventional treatment during the DCCT led to differences in these parameters during EDIC. After 6.5 years of intensive versus conventional therapy in the DCCT, and 15 years of additional follow-up in EDIC, left ventricular (LV) indices were measured by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging in 1,017 of the 1,371 members of the DCCT cohort. There were no differences between the DCCT intensive versus conventional treatment in end diastolic volume (EDV), end systolic volume, stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (CO), LV mass, ejection fraction, LV mass/EDV, or aortic distensibility (AD). Mean DCCT/EDIC HbA1c over time was associated with EDV, SV, CO, LV mass, LV mass/EDV, and AD. These associations persisted after adjustment for CVD risk factors. Cardiac function and remodeling in T1DM assessed by CMR in the EDIC cohort was associated with prior glycemic exposure, but there was no effect of intensive versus conventional treatment during the DCCT on cardiac parameters.

摘要

强化糖尿病治疗可降低冠状动脉钙化、动脉粥样硬化进展以及心血管疾病(CVD)事件的风险,这在糖尿病控制和并发症试验(DCCT)/糖尿病干预和并发症流行病学(EDIC)研究中已得到证实。但在 1 型糖尿病(T1DM)中,强化治疗对心脏功能和结构的测量以及对血糖的影响尚未得到探索。我们评估了在 DCCT 期间强化治疗与常规治疗相比是否导致 EDIC 期间这些参数的差异。在 DCCT 中进行了 6.5 年的强化治疗与常规治疗,以及 EDIC 中额外的 15 年随访后,在 DCCT 队列的 1371 名成员中的 1017 名接受了心脏磁共振(CMR)成像测量左心室(LV)指数。在 DCCT 强化治疗与常规治疗之间,舒张末期容积(EDV)、收缩末期容积、每搏量(SV)、心输出量(CO)、LV 质量、射血分数、LV 质量/EDV 或主动脉扩张性(AD)均无差异。DCCT/EDIC 期间平均 HbA1c 与 EDV、SV、CO、LV 质量、LV 质量/EDV 和 AD 相关。这些相关性在调整 CVD 危险因素后仍然存在。EDIC 队列中 CMR 评估的 T1DM 心脏功能和重构与既往血糖暴露有关,但 DCCT 期间强化治疗与常规治疗对心脏参数无影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec67/3781466/35cbd8fa7312/3561fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验