Asteriou C, Antonitsis P, Argiriadou H, Deliopoulos A, Konstantinou D, Foroulis C, Papakonstantinou C, Anastasiadis K
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, AHEPA University Hospital, 542 48, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Perfusion. 2013 Jul;28(4):350-6. doi: 10.1177/0267659113479135. Epub 2013 Mar 21.
Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) using minimal extracorporeal circulation (MECC) has been associated with an improved short-term clinical outcome compared to conventional extracorporeal circulation (CECC). The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of MECC compared to CECC on postoperative major adverse events in high-risk patients undergoing elective coronary revascularization procedures. Two hundred patients undergoing elective CABG were randomized into two groups. In Group A (n=100), MECC was used while Group B (n=100) included patients who were operated on CECC. The incidence of postoperative major adverse events (myocardial infarction, renal failure, stroke, death) was the primary end-point of the study. MECC was associated with a 77% relative risk reduction in the incidence of major adverse events compared to CECC (p=0.004). The rate of major adverse events occurring in the high-risk patient subgroup (preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40%, age >65 years, EuroSCORE II >5) operated on with MECC was significantly lower in comparison to their CECC counterparts. Based on our results, cardiac centres should be encouraged to use MECC as the standard circuit when performing elective coronary procedures, even in a high-risk population.
与传统体外循环(CECC)相比,使用微创体外循环(MECC)进行冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)与短期临床结局改善相关。本研究的目的是评估与CECC相比,MECC对接受择期冠状动脉血运重建手术的高危患者术后主要不良事件的影响。200例接受择期CABG的患者被随机分为两组。A组(n = 100)使用MECC,而B组(n = 100)包括接受CECC手术的患者。术后主要不良事件(心肌梗死、肾衰竭、中风、死亡)的发生率是本研究的主要终点。与CECC相比,MECC使主要不良事件的发生率相对风险降低了77%(p = 0.004)。与接受CECC手术的患者相比,接受MECC手术的高危患者亚组(术前左心室射血分数≤40%、年龄>65岁、欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统II>5)发生主要不良事件的比率显著更低。基于我们的结果,应鼓励心脏中心在进行择期冠状动脉手术时,即使是在高危人群中,也将MECC作为标准的体外循环方式。