• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

左半球和右半球形式的语音失读症。

Left- and right-hemisphere forms of phonological alexia.

机构信息

Cognitive Neuroscience Sector, SISSA, Trieste, Italy.

出版信息

Cogn Neuropsychol. 2012;29(7-8):531-49. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2013.771773.

DOI:10.1080/02643294.2013.771773
PMID:23521052
Abstract

We studied the ability of patients with lesions arising from operation for an anterior or posterior (left or right) brain tumour to read a set of words and pronounceable nonwords. In line with previous works, we observed that damage to the left posterior or left anterior cortex can give rise to phonological alexia, where the reading performance of nonwords is affected more than that of words. More surprisingly, similar effects were found in the right posterior group. However, there were significant differences in the error types, for both complex and positional errors, between phonological alexic patients in the three location groups. The findings present difficulties for the position held by theorists of the triangle model that phonological alexia arises from impairments in the language production system or in a general-purpose orthographic-phonological translation system. They also pose new questions about the possible role of the right posterior cortex in letter sequence representation.

摘要

我们研究了因左或右脑肿瘤手术而产生病变的患者阅读一组单词和可发音的假词的能力。与之前的工作一致,我们观察到左后或左前皮质损伤会导致语音性失读症,其中假词的阅读表现比单词更受影响。更令人惊讶的是,在右后组中也发现了类似的效果。然而,在三个位置组的语音性失读症患者中,无论是复杂错误还是位置错误,错误类型都存在显著差异。这些发现给三角形模型理论学家所提出的观点带来了困难,即语音性失读症是由于语言产生系统或通用的正字法-语音翻译系统的损伤引起的。它们也对右后皮质在字母序列表示中的可能作用提出了新的问题。

相似文献

1
Left- and right-hemisphere forms of phonological alexia.左半球和右半球形式的语音失读症。
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2012;29(7-8):531-49. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2013.771773.
2
Deep dyslexia and semantic errors: a test of the failure of inhibition hypothesis using a semantic blocking paradigm.深度诵读困难与语义错误:使用语义阻断范式对抑制失败假说的一项检验。
Brain Cogn. 2004 Apr;54(3):232-4. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.02.016.
3
Recovery from deep alexia to phonological alexia: points on a continuum.
Brain Lang. 1996 Jan;52(1):114-28. doi: 10.1006/brln.1996.0006.
4
Acquired dyslexia.后天性阅读障碍
Semin Neurol. 2000;20(4):419-26. doi: 10.1055/s-2000-13174.
5
Reading with the right hemisphere: evidence from transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Brain Lang. 1994 Feb;46(2):198-211. doi: 10.1006/brln.1994.1012.
6
Right-hemisphere reading in a case of developmental deep dyslexia.发育性深度阅读障碍一例中的右脑阅读
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2007 Sep;60(9):1187-96. doi: 10.1080/17470210701425845.
7
Language lateralization in phonological, semantic and orthographic tasks: a slow evoked potential study.语音、语义和正字法任务中的语言侧化:一项慢诱发电位研究。
Behav Brain Res. 2006 Dec 15;175(2):296-304. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2006.08.038. Epub 2006 Oct 12.
8
Priming vs. rhyming: orthographic and phonological representations in the left and right hemispheres.启动效应与押韵:左右半球的正字法和语音表征
Brain Cogn. 2008 Nov;68(2):193-203. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2008.04.005. Epub 2008 Jun 16.
9
Cortical reorganization in dyslexic children after phonological training: evidence from early evoked potentials.语音训练后阅读障碍儿童大脑皮层重组:来自早期诱发电位的证据。
Brain. 2010 Nov;133(11):3385-95. doi: 10.1093/brain/awq199. Epub 2010 Aug 5.
10
Optokinetic stimulation affects word omissions but not stimulus-centered reading errors in paragraph reading in neglect dyslexia.视动刺激影响词缺失,但不影响忽视性阅读障碍患者在段落阅读中以刺激为中心的阅读错误。
Neuropsychologia. 2011 Jul;49(9):2728-35. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.05.022. Epub 2011 Jun 6.

引用本文的文献

1
The Additional Contribution of White Matter Hyperintensity Location to Post-stroke Cognitive Impairment: Insights From a Multiple-Lesion Symptom Mapping Study.白质高信号位置对中风后认知障碍的额外影响:来自多病灶症状映射研究的见解
Front Neurosci. 2018 May 1;12:290. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00290. eCollection 2018.