Kemény Ferenc, Lukács Agnes
Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Department of Cognitive Science, Budapest, Hungary.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2013 May;143(1):58-64. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.02.008. Epub 2013 Mar 20.
The current study investigates whether probabilistic categorization on the Weather Prediction task involves a single, modality/domain general learning mechanism or there are modality/domain differences. The same probabilistic categorization task was used in three modalities/domains and two modes of presentation. Cues consisted of visual, auditory-verbal or auditory-nonverbal stimuli, and were presented either sequentially or simultaneously. Results show that while there was no general difference in performance across modalities/domains, the mode of presentation affected them differently. In the visual modality, simultaneous performance had a general advantage over sequential presentation, while in the auditory conditions, there was an initial advantage of simultaneous presentation, which disappeared, and in the non-verbal condition, gave over to a sequential advantage in the later stages of learning. Data suggest that there are strong peripheral modality effects; however, there are no signs of modality/domain of stimuli centrally affecting categorization.
当前的研究调查了天气预报任务中的概率分类是否涉及单一的、模态/领域通用的学习机制,还是存在模态/领域差异。在三种模态/领域和两种呈现模式下使用了相同的概率分类任务。线索由视觉、听觉语言或听觉非语言刺激组成,并以顺序或同时的方式呈现。结果表明,虽然跨模态/领域的表现没有总体差异,但呈现模式对它们的影响不同。在视觉模态中,同时呈现的表现总体上优于顺序呈现,而在听觉条件下,同时呈现最初具有优势,但这种优势消失了,在非语言条件下,在学习后期被顺序呈现的优势所取代。数据表明存在强烈的外周模态效应;然而,没有迹象表明刺激的模态/领域会对分类产生中枢影响。