Department of Periodontics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas 78229-3900, USA.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013 Mar-Apr;28(2):494-502. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3081.
To evaluate the biologic width dimensions around implants with nonmatching implant-abutment diameters.
Five canines had their mandibular premolars and first molars removed bilaterally and replaced with 12 implants that had nonmatching implant-abutment diameters. On one side, six implants were placed in a submerged surgical approach, and the other side utilized a nonsubmerged approach. Two of the implants on each side were placed either 1 mm above, even with, or 1 mm below the alveolar crest. Two months later, gold crowns were attached, and the dogs were sacrificed 6 months postloading. Block sections were processed for histologic and histomorphometric analyses.
The bone level, connective tissue length, epithelial dimension, and biologic width were not significantly different when the implants were initially placed in a submerged or nonsubmerged surgical approach. The bone level was significantly different around implants placed 1 mm above the crest compared to implants placed even with or 1 mm below the alveolar crest. The connective tissue dimension was not different for any implant level placement. The epithelial dimension and biologic width were significantly greater for implants placed 1 mm below the alveolar crest compared to implants placed even with or 1 mm above the alveolar crest. For five of six implant placements, connective tissue covered the implant/abutment interface.
This study reveals a fundamental change in the biologic response to implants with nonmatching implant-abutment diameters. Unlike implants with matching implant-abutment diameters, the connective tissue extended coronally past the interface (microgap). This morphologic tissue alteration represents a significant change in the biologic reaction to implant-abutment interfaces and suggests that marginal inflammation is eliminated or greatly reduced in these implant designs.
评估非匹配种植体-基台直径的种植体周围生物学宽度的维度。
5 只犬双侧下颌切牙和第一磨牙被拔除,并用 12 个非匹配种植体-基台直径的种植体替代。一侧采用潜入式手术方法,另一侧采用非潜入式手术方法。每侧的两个种植体放置在牙槽嵴上方 1mm、与牙槽嵴平齐或牙槽嵴下方 1mm。2 个月后,安装金冠,加载后 6 个月处死犬只。进行块段处理,用于组织学和组织形态计量学分析。
植入物初始放置在潜入式或非潜入式手术方法时,骨水平、结缔组织长度、上皮维度和生物学宽度没有显著差异。与放置在牙槽嵴平齐或牙槽嵴下方 1mm 的种植体相比,放置在牙槽嵴上方 1mm 的种植体的骨水平显著不同。对于任何种植体水平放置,结缔组织维度没有差异。与放置在牙槽嵴平齐或牙槽嵴上方 1mm 的种植体相比,放置在牙槽嵴下方 1mm 的种植体的上皮维度和生物学宽度显著更大。对于 6 个种植体中的 5 个,结缔组织覆盖了种植体/基台界面。
本研究揭示了非匹配种植体-基台直径的种植体周围生物学反应的根本变化。与匹配种植体-基台直径的种植体不同,结缔组织向冠方延伸超过了界面(微间隙)。这种形态组织改变代表了对种植体-基台界面的生物学反应的重大变化,并表明在这些种植体设计中,边缘炎症被消除或大大减少。