Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Skin Cancer Center, University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50927 Cologne, Germany.
Br J Dermatol. 2013 Apr;168(4):708-16. doi: 10.1111/bjd.12140.
BACKGROUND: Inhibitors of the mutated, constitutively activated BRAF protein have shown efficacy in the treatment of metastatic melanoma in clinical trials. Mutation analysis especially of the BRAF, NRAS and KIT genes is essential to identify patients suitable for targeted therapies and has been introduced into routine patient care. OBJECTIVES: To correlate mutational status with clinical parameters including age, skin type, number of melanocytic naevi, primary tumour location, chronic sun damage and exposure to ultraviolet (UV) irradiation. The overall aim was to define subgroups with an increased or decreased likelihood of gene mutations. Additionally, the impact of activating BRAF mutations on clinical course was investigated. METHODS: In a single-centre, retrospective approach, mutation analysis was performed on patients with metastatic malignant melanoma. Clinical parameters were correlated with molecular findings. The total sun-burden score was assessed using a validated standardized questionnaire. RESULTS: The analysis included 141 patients with metastatic melanoma. Forty-four per cent of patients had activating BRAF mutations and were significantly younger than patients with wild-type BRAF or with NRAS mutations. KIT mutations were detected in only 3% of the patients. BRAF-mutated melanomas developed preferentially in intermittently sun-exposed areas of the body, and patients had significantly more melanocytic naevi. Once patients had progressed into stage IV disease, survival times were identical for those with BRAF-mutated and BRAF wild-type tumours. CONCLUSIONS: Mutations of the BRAF gene are correlated with younger age, a higher number of melanocytic naevi and a tumour location in intermittently UV-exposed skin. Signs of chronic photodamage are not indicative of mutational status. Patients with metastatic melanoma with BRAF mutations showed a nonsignificant tendency to progress later to stage IV disease, but once metastases were present the prognosis was identical to that with BRAF wild-type tumours.
背景:在临床试验中,BRAF 蛋白的突变型、组成型激活抑制剂在转移性黑色素瘤的治疗中显示出疗效。突变分析,尤其是 BRAF、NRAS 和 KIT 基因的突变分析,对于确定适合靶向治疗的患者至关重要,并且已经被引入常规的患者护理中。
目的:将突变状态与临床参数(包括年龄、皮肤类型、黑素细胞痣数量、原发肿瘤位置、慢性日光损伤和紫外线(UV)照射暴露)相关联。总体目标是确定基因突变可能性增加或减少的亚组。此外,还研究了激活 BRAF 突变对临床病程的影响。
方法:采用单中心回顾性方法,对转移性恶性黑色素瘤患者进行突变分析。将临床参数与分子发现相关联。使用经过验证的标准化问卷评估总日光负荷评分。
结果:该分析纳入了 141 例转移性黑色素瘤患者。44%的患者存在激活型 BRAF 突变,且明显比 BRAF 野生型或 NRAS 突变患者年轻。仅 3%的患者检测到 KIT 突变。BRAF 突变型黑色素瘤主要发生在身体间歇性暴露于阳光下的部位,且患者的黑素细胞痣数量明显更多。一旦患者进展为 IV 期疾病,BRAF 突变型和 BRAF 野生型肿瘤的生存时间相同。
结论:BRAF 基因的突变与年龄较小、黑素细胞痣数量较多以及间歇性 UV 暴露皮肤的肿瘤位置相关。慢性光损伤的迹象不能指示突变状态。具有 BRAF 突变的转移性黑色素瘤患者进展为 IV 期疾病的趋势不显著,但一旦出现转移,其预后与 BRAF 野生型肿瘤相同。
J Clin Oncol. 2011-2-22
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015-1-26
Cells. 2024-8-20
Front Oncol. 2022-5-30
J Cutan Pathol. 2014-9