Suppr超能文献

BRAF 和 NRAS 突变在黑色素瘤中的预后意义:一项来自常规护理的德国研究。

Prognostic significance of BRAF and NRAS mutations in melanoma: a German study from routine care.

机构信息

Department of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital of Munich (LMU), Frauenlobstr. 9-11, 80337, Munich, Germany.

Division of Health Care Sciences, Center for Clinical Research and Management Education, Dresden International University, Freiberger Str. 37, 01067, Dresden, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Cancer. 2017 Aug 10;17(1):536. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3529-5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hotspot mutations of the oncogenes BRAF and NRAS are the most common genetic alterations in cutaneous melanoma. Specific inhibitors of BRAF and MEK have shown significant survival benefits in large phase III trials. However, the prognostic significance of BRAF and NRAS mutations outside of clinical trials remains unclear.

METHODS

The mutational status of BRAF (exon 15) and NRAS (exon 2 and 3) was determined in melanoma samples of 217 patients with pyrosequencing and Sanger sequencing. The genotypes were correlated with clinical outcomes and pathologic features of the primary tumors. Time to disease progression was calculated with the cumulative incidence function. Survival analyses were performed with Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. Relative survival was calculated with the Ederer-II method. Treatment with BRAF and MEK inhibitors and immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) was allowed.

RESULTS

Mutations in BRAF and NRAS were identified in 40.1 and 24.4% of cases, respectively. Concurrent mutations in both genes were detected in further 2.3%. The remaining 33.2% were wild type for the investigated exons (WT). BRAF mutations were significantly associated with younger age at first diagnosis (p < 0.001) and truncal localization of the culprit primary (p = 0.002). The nodular subtype was most common in the NRAS cohort. In addition, NRAS-mutant melanoma patients showed a higher frequency of nodal relapse (p = 0.013) and development of metastatic disease (p = 0.021). The time to loco-regional nodal relapse was shortest in NRAS-mutant melanoma (p = 0.002). Presence of NRAS mutation was an independent risk factor for disease progression in multivariate analysis (HR 2.01; 95% CI 1.02 - 3.98). BRAF-mutant melanoma patients showed a tendency for better overall and relative survival. Genotype was not a consistent risk factor in multivariate analysis. Instead, positive sentinel lymph node status (HR 2.65; 95% CI 1.15 - 6.10) and treatment with ICB in stage IV disease (HR 0.17; 95% CI 0.06-0.48) were significant multivariate risk factors.

CONCLUSIONS

NRAS-mutant tumors tended to behave more aggressively particularly in early stages of the disease in this high-risk melanoma population. Treatment with immune checkpoint blockade improved survival in stage IV disease in a real-world setting.

摘要

背景

BRAF 和 NRAS 癌基因的热点突变是皮肤黑色素瘤中最常见的遗传改变。BRAF 和 MEK 的特异性抑制剂在大型 III 期试验中显示出显著的生存获益。然而,临床试验之外 BRAF 和 NRAS 突变的预后意义尚不清楚。

方法

采用焦磷酸测序和 Sanger 测序法检测 217 例黑色素瘤患者的 BRAF(外显子 15)和 NRAS(外显子 2 和 3)突变状态。将基因型与肿瘤的临床结果和病理特征相关联。采用累积发病率函数计算疾病进展时间。采用 Kaplan-Meier 估计和 Cox 比例风险回归分析进行生存分析。采用 Ederer-II 法计算相对生存率。允许接受 BRAF 和 MEK 抑制剂以及免疫检查点阻断(ICB)治疗。

结果

分别在 40.1%和 24.4%的病例中发现 BRAF 和 NRAS 突变。在进一步的 2.3%的病例中检测到两个基因的同时突变。其余 33.2%的病例为研究外显子的野生型(WT)。BRAF 突变与首次诊断时年龄较小(p<0.001)和原发肿瘤的躯干定位显著相关(p=0.002)。结节型是 NRAS 队列中最常见的亚型。此外,NRAS 突变型黑色素瘤患者淋巴结复发(p=0.013)和转移性疾病发展(p=0.021)的频率更高。NRAS 突变黑色素瘤患者局部区域淋巴结复发的时间最短(p=0.002)。多变量分析中 NRAS 突变是疾病进展的独立危险因素(HR 2.01;95%CI 1.02-3.98)。BRAF 突变型黑色素瘤患者的总生存率和相对生存率有改善的趋势。基因型不是多变量分析中的一致危险因素。相反,前哨淋巴结阳性状态(HR 2.65;95%CI 1.15-6.10)和 IV 期疾病的免疫检查点阻断治疗(HR 0.17;95%CI 0.06-0.48)是显著的多变量危险因素。

结论

在这一高危黑色素瘤人群中,NRAS 突变肿瘤的行为往往更为激进,特别是在疾病的早期阶段。在真实世界环境中,免疫检查点阻断治疗改善了 IV 期疾病的生存。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a313/5553744/d85e0cf2399a/12885_2017_3529_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验