Department of Operative Dentistry and Peridontology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
J Adhes Dent. 2013 Apr;15(2):107-14. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a28671.
To evaluate the composite-to-enamel bond following double etching of the enamel using phosphoric acid and different self-etching (SE) bonding systems with and without the application of their respective acidic primers.
The enamel surfaces of 90 human molars were ground (600 grit) flat and randomly divided into nine groups (n = 10). Three two-step SE systems (AdheSE, ASE; Clearfil SE Bond, CSE; OptiBond Solo Plus SE, OSE) were tested, both with and without primer application on enamel pre-etched with phosphoric acid under dry bonding conditions. As the controls, the SE systems were applied according to their original directions without pre-etching. All the specimens were built up with a microhybrid composite resin (Arabesk Top). After water storage for 24 h at 37°C, the bonded specimens were sheared to failure in the Zwicki 1120. Etching and failure patterns were evaluated using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Shear bond strength was analyzed with two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test. Failure modes were analyzed with Fisher's exact test.
Without pre-etching, CSE showed significantly higher bond strengths than ASE and OSE (p < 0.05). Enamel etching prior to the application of the SE systems tended to result in higher bond strengths, but significantly increased the values only for ASE (p < 0.05). Contamination of the pre-etched enamel with the SE primer decreased the bond strength by values of 19% for ASE (p > 0.05), 36% for CSE (p < 0.05), and 75% for OSE (p < 0.05). SEM analysis showed that omission of the priming step significantly increased the number of cohesive failures within the resin for OSE (p < 0.0001).
Additional etching with phosphoric acid before the application of SE systems does not necessarily result in better enamel bonding, since unavoidable primer contamination of the pre-etched enamel was shown to significantly reduce the bond strength for two of the three systems tested.
评估使用磷酸对牙釉质进行双重酸蚀后,复合树脂与牙釉质的粘结强度,以及不同自酸蚀粘结系统在使用和不使用各自酸性底胶时的粘结效果。
将 90 个人类磨牙的牙釉质表面用 600 目砂纸打磨平整,然后随机分为 9 组(每组 10 个样本)。在干粘结条件下,对牙釉质进行预酸蚀(磷酸)后,分别测试三种两步自酸蚀粘结系统(AdheSE、ASE;Clearfil SE Bond、CSE;OptiBond Solo Plus SE、OSE),并比较其在使用和不使用酸性底胶时的粘结效果。作为对照组,按照说明书要求,不进行预酸蚀,直接使用各自酸蚀粘结系统。所有样本均使用微混合复合树脂(Arabesk Top)进行堆塑。37°C 下储水 24 小时后,将粘结样本在 Zwicki 1120 万能试验机上进行剪切试验,直至破坏。用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)观察粘结和破坏模式。采用双因素方差分析和 Tukey 检验对剪切粘结强度进行分析。采用 Fisher 确切概率法对破坏模式进行分析。
不进行预酸蚀时,CSE 的粘结强度明显高于 ASE 和 OSE(p < 0.05)。在使用自酸蚀粘结系统前对牙釉质进行预处理会提高粘结强度,但仅对 ASE 有显著提高(p < 0.05)。预酸蚀牙釉质被自酸蚀底胶污染后,ASE 的粘结强度降低了 19%(p > 0.05),CSE 的粘结强度降低了 36%(p < 0.05),OSE 的粘结强度降低了 75%(p < 0.05)。SEM 分析显示,OSE 省略底胶步骤后,树脂内的粘结破坏显著增加(p < 0.0001)。
在使用自酸蚀粘结系统前对牙釉质进行额外酸蚀不一定能提高牙釉质的粘结效果,因为预酸蚀牙釉质被不可避免地污染后,三种测试系统中有两种的粘结强度显著降低。