Beloncle François, Lerolle Nicolas, Radermacher Peter, Asfar Pierre
Crit Care. 2013 Mar 26;17(2):126. doi: 10.1186/cc12543.
The optimal target blood pressure in septic shock is still unknown. Therefore, in a long-term, resuscitated porcine model of fecal peritonitis-induced septic shock, Corrêa and colleagues tested whether different titrations of mean arterial pressure (50 to 60 and 75 to 85 mm Hg) would produce different effects on sepsis-related organ dysfunction. The higher blood pressure window was associated with increased needs for fluid resuscitation and norepinephrine support. However, titrating the lower blood pressure range coincided with an increased incidence of acute kidney injury. In contrast, neither the inflammatory response nor tissue mitochondrial activity showed any difference. This research paper in a clinically relevant model elegantly demonstrates that any standard resuscitation strategy may be a double-edged sword with respect to various therapeutic endpoints. Furthermore, it adds an important piece to the puzzle of the complex pathophysiology of sepsis-related acute kidney injury.
感染性休克的最佳目标血压仍不清楚。因此,在一个长期的、复苏后的猪粪便性腹膜炎诱导感染性休克模型中,科雷亚及其同事测试了不同滴定水平的平均动脉压(50至60毫米汞柱和75至85毫米汞柱)是否会对脓毒症相关器官功能障碍产生不同影响。较高的血压范围与液体复苏和去甲肾上腺素支持需求增加有关。然而,滴定较低血压范围与急性肾损伤发生率增加相吻合。相比之下,炎症反应和组织线粒体活性均未显示出任何差异。这篇发表在具有临床相关性模型中的研究论文巧妙地证明,任何标准复苏策略对于各种治疗终点而言都可能是一把双刃剑。此外,它为脓毒症相关急性肾损伤复杂病理生理学难题增添了重要一环。