• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

暴力极端组织生态面临压力。

Violent extremist group ecologies under stress.

机构信息

Media Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2013;3:1544. doi: 10.1038/srep01544.

DOI:10.1038/srep01544
PMID:23536118
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3609479/
Abstract

Violent extremist groups are currently making intensive use of Internet fora for recruitment to terrorism. These fora are under constant scrutiny by security agencies, private vigilante groups, and hackers, who sometimes shut them down with cybernetic attacks. However, there is a lack of experimental and formal understanding of the recruitment dynamics of online extremist fora and the effect of strategies to control them. Here, we utilize data on ten extremist fora that we collected for four years to develop a data-driven mathematical model that is the first attempt to measure whether (and how) these external attacks induce extremist fora to self-regulate. The results suggest that an increase in the number of groups targeted for attack causes an exponential increase in the cost of enforcement and an exponential decrease in its effectiveness. Thus, a policy to occasionally attack large groups can be very efficient for limiting violent output from these fora.

摘要

暴力极端组织目前正在密集利用互联网论坛招募恐怖分子。这些论坛受到安全机构、私人义务警员组织和黑客的持续监控,他们有时会通过网络攻击将其关闭。然而,对于在线极端主义论坛的招募动态以及控制这些论坛的策略的效果,缺乏实验和正式的理解。在这里,我们利用四年时间收集的十个极端主义论坛的数据,开发了一个数据驱动的数学模型,这是首次尝试衡量(以及如何衡量)这些外部攻击是否会促使极端主义论坛进行自我监管。结果表明,针对攻击目标的群体数量的增加会导致执法成本呈指数级增加,而其效果呈指数级下降。因此,偶尔攻击大型群体的政策对于限制这些论坛的暴力输出非常有效。

相似文献

1
Violent extremist group ecologies under stress.暴力极端组织生态面临压力。
Sci Rep. 2013;3:1544. doi: 10.1038/srep01544.
2
Recruitment and selection in violent extremist organizations: Exploring what industrial and organizational psychology might contribute.暴力极端组织的招募与选拔:探究工业与组织心理学可能做出的贡献
Am Psychol. 2017 Apr;72(3):242-254. doi: 10.1037/amp0000089.
3
Is Extreme in the Eye of the Beholder? An Experimental Assessment of Extremist Cognitions.极端在旁观者的眼中?对极端认知的实验评估。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Apr;37(7-8):NP4865-NP4888. doi: 10.1177/0886260520958645. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
4
The reception of broadcast terrorism: recruitment and radicalisation.广播恐怖主义的接受:招募与激进化。
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2017 Aug;29(4):320-326. doi: 10.1080/09540261.2017.1343529.
5
Understanding Violent Extremism: Identifying Motivational Classes in Male Jihadist Detainees.理解暴力极端主义:确定男性圣战被拘留者的动机类别。
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2023 Nov;67(15):1455-1473. doi: 10.1177/0306624X221144295. Epub 2023 Jan 13.
6
The Interaction of Extremist Propaganda and Anger as Predictors of Violent Responses.极端主义宣传与愤怒的相互作用对暴力反应的预测。
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Feb;36(3-4):NP1391-1411NP. doi: 10.1177/0886260517747599. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
7
A Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory of Violent Extremist Propaganda: The Motivational Pathways Underlying Movement Toward and Away From Violent Extremist Action.暴力极端主义宣传的强化敏感性理论:走向和远离暴力极端主义行动背后的动机路径。
Front Psychol. 2022 May 19;13:858392. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.858392. eCollection 2022.
8
Assessing risks of violent extremism in depressive disorders: Developing and validating a new measure of Sympathies for Violent Protest and Terrorism.评估抑郁障碍中的暴力极端主义风险:开发和验证一种新的暴力抗议和恐怖主义共鸣度量表。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2020 Nov;54(11):1078-1085. doi: 10.1177/0004867420944520. Epub 2020 Jul 23.
9
Cultural threat perceptions predict violent extremism via need for cognitive closure.文化威胁认知通过认知封闭需求预测暴力极端主义。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 May 16;120(20):e2213874120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2213874120. Epub 2023 May 8.
10
Distinct patterns of incidental exposure to and active selection of radicalizing information indicate varying levels of support for violent extremism.不同的偶然接触和主动选择激进化信息的模式表明对暴力极端主义的支持程度不同。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 14;19(2):e0293810. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293810. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Good fences: the importance of setting boundaries for peaceful coexistence.良好的界限:为和平共处设定边界的重要性。
PLoS One. 2014 May 21;9(5):e95660. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095660. eCollection 2014.
2
The developmental dynamics of terrorist organizations.恐怖组织的发展动态。
PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e48633. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048633. Epub 2012 Nov 21.
3
Violence: The role of society and state.
Nature. 2011 Dec 7;480(7376):181. doi: 10.1038/480181a.
4
Global comparison of warring groups in 2002-2007: fatalities from targeting civilians vs. fighting battles.2002-2007 年参战各方的全球比较:以袭击平民与战斗伤亡人数相比。
PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e23976. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023976. Epub 2011 Sep 6.
5
Civil conflicts are associated with the global climate.内战与全球气候有关。
Nature. 2011 Aug 24;476(7361):438-41. doi: 10.1038/nature10311.
6
Content disputes in Wikipedia reflect geopolitical instability.维基百科的内容争议反映了地缘政治的不稳定。
PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e20902. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020902. Epub 2011 Jun 22.
7
Pattern in escalations in insurgent and terrorist activity.叛乱和恐怖活动升级的模式。
Science. 2011 Jul 1;333(6038):81-4. doi: 10.1126/science.1205068.
8
Small but slow world: how network topology and burstiness slow down spreading.小而慢的世界:网络拓扑结构和突发性如何减缓传播
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2011 Feb;83(2 Pt 2):025102. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.83.025102. Epub 2011 Feb 18.
9
The war in Afghanistan. Counting the dead in Afghanistan.阿富汗战争。统计阿富汗的死亡人数。
Science. 2011 Mar 11;331(6022):1256-60. doi: 10.1126/science.2011.331.6022.331_1256.
10
Decentralize, adapt and cooperate.
Nature. 2010 May 20;465(7296):292-3. doi: 10.1038/465292a.