Research and Development, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA 98108, USA.
Liver Transpl. 2013 Jun;19(6):634-45. doi: 10.1002/lt.23652.
We aimed to determine whether combining serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) tumor burden would allow better stratification of posttransplant survival for patients with HCC undergoing liver transplantation. Adjusting for donor and recipient characteristics, we calculated the risk of posttransplant mortality associated with serum AFP level or HCC tumor burden for all first-time adult liver transplants performed in the United States between 2002 and 2011 (n = 45,267). Serum AFP level, rather than tumor burden, was the tumor characteristic most strongly associated with posttransplant survival. Although recipients with HCC and a serum AFP level ≤ 15 ng/mL at the time of transplantation had no excess posttransplant mortality [adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) = 1.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.93-1.12], patients with a serum AFP level of 16 to 65 ng/mL (AHR = 1.38, 95% CI = 1.23-1.54), patients with a serum AFP level of 66 to 320 ng/mL (AHR = 1.65, 95% CI = 1.45-1.88), and patients with a serum AFP level > 320 ng/mL (AHR = 2.37, 95% CI = 2.06-2.73) had progressively worse posttransplant mortality in comparison with recipients without HCC. Patients with a tumor burden exceeding the Milan criteria (who are usually excluded from transplantation) had excellent posttransplant survival if their serum AFP level was 0 to 15 ng/mL (AHR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.66-1.43). In contrast, patients within the Milan criteria (who are routinely considered to be transplant candidates) had poor survival if their serum AFP level was substantially elevated (for a serum AFP level ≥ 66 ng/mL, AHR = 1.93, 95% CI = 1.74-2.15). Changes in serum AFP level while patients were on the waiting list corresponded closely to changes in posttransplant mortality. In conclusion, the absolute serum AFP level and changes in the serum AFP level strongly predict posttransplant survival independently of the tumor burden. We hope that these data, in combination with other factors, can be used to inform future studies and ongoing discussions aimed at improving the eligibility criteria for liver transplantation for patients with HCC.
我们旨在确定在接受肝移植的 HCC 患者中,联合血清甲胎蛋白(AFP)水平与 HCC 肿瘤负担是否能够更好地分层移植后的生存情况。我们根据供体和受体的特征,计算了 2002 年至 2011 年期间美国首次进行的所有成人肝移植中与血清 AFP 水平或 HCC 肿瘤负担相关的移植后死亡风险(n=45267)。血清 AFP 水平而不是肿瘤负担,是与移植后生存最密切相关的肿瘤特征。尽管移植时血清 AFP 水平≤15ng/mL 的 HCC 患者没有额外的移植后死亡风险(调整后的危险比[AHR]=1.02,95%置信区间[CI]=0.93-1.12),但血清 AFP 水平为 16 至 65ng/mL 的患者(AHR=1.38,95%CI=1.23-1.54)、血清 AFP 水平为 66 至 320ng/mL 的患者(AHR=1.65,95%CI=1.45-1.88)和血清 AFP 水平>320ng/mL 的患者(AHR=2.37,95%CI=2.06-2.73)的移植后死亡率逐渐增加,与没有 HCC 的患者相比。如果肿瘤负担超过米兰标准(通常排除移植)的患者其血清 AFP 水平为 0 至 15ng/mL,则移植后生存良好(AHR=0.97,95%CI=0.66-1.43)。相比之下,如果肿瘤负担在米兰标准范围内(通常被认为是移植候选者)的患者其血清 AFP 水平显著升高(血清 AFP 水平≥66ng/mL,AHR=1.93,95%CI=1.74-2.15),则生存状况较差。患者在等待名单上时血清 AFP 水平的变化与移植后死亡率的变化密切相关。总之,绝对血清 AFP 水平和血清 AFP 水平的变化独立于肿瘤负担强烈预测移植后生存。我们希望这些数据,结合其他因素,可以用于为未来旨在改善 HCC 患者肝移植资格标准的研究和正在进行的讨论提供信息。