Suppr超能文献

患病或受伤后获得的不同类型的经济支持是否会影响社会经济结果?新西兰的一项自然实验。

Do different types of financial support after illness or injury affect socio-economic outcomes? A natural experiment in New Zealand.

机构信息

Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, PO Box 913, Dunedin, Otago 9054, New Zealand.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2013 May;85:93-102. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.02.041. Epub 2013 Mar 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In New Zealand, people unable to work due to an illness may be eligible for a means-tested benefit whereas injured people are eligible for a wide range of support including earnings-related compensation through the no-fault Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC). The effect of this difference on socio-economic outcomes has not been investigated before.

METHODS

A comparative cohort study was undertaken of stroke versus injury. Individuals aged 18-64, who had a first-stroke (n = 109) were matched by age, sex and functional impairment with injured individuals (n = 429) participating in the Prospective Outcomes of Injury Study. Data were collected by interview 3.5 and 12 months after stroke or injury. Logistic regression adjusting for the matching variables at 3.5 months, and functional impairment at 12 months, was undertaken.

RESULTS

Median personal income declined by 60% over 12 months for the Stroke Group compared to 13% decline in the Injury Group. Decline in income was greater for those in both groups who had a higher income initially, and for those who had not returned to work. The proportion of the Stroke Group reporting 'Fairly low/low' standard of living increased from 8% to 28% and 'Just/not enough' income increased from 35% to 61% whereas the Injury Group increased only from 5% to 12% and 33%-44% respectively. The odds of reporting low standard of living and income inadequacy at 12 months were significantly less for the Injury Group. Despite earnings-related compensation (80% of income), the odds of being back at work were greater for the Injury Group compared to the Stroke Group (Adjusted Odds Ratio 3.1; 95% CI 1.7-5.6).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings support the conclusions that earnings-related compensation and rehabilitative support, available to injured people via ACC, largely prevents the downward spiral into poverty and ill health. It also appears to enhance return to work though residual confounding cannot be ruled out.

摘要

背景

在新西兰,因病无法工作的人可能有资格获得经济状况调查福利,而受伤的人则有资格获得广泛的支持,包括通过无过错事故赔偿公司(ACC)获得与收入相关的赔偿。这种差异对社会经济结果的影响以前尚未被调查过。

方法

对中风与损伤进行了比较队列研究。年龄在 18-64 岁之间的首次中风患者(n=109),根据年龄、性别和功能障碍与参加前瞻性损伤研究的损伤患者(n=429)进行匹配。数据通过中风或损伤后 3.5 个月和 12 个月的访谈收集。在 3.5 个月时,对调整匹配变量的逻辑回归进行了分析,并在 12 个月时对功能障碍进行了分析。

结果

中风组的个人收入中位数在 12 个月内下降了 60%,而损伤组下降了 13%。对于最初收入较高且尚未重返工作岗位的两组患者,收入下降幅度更大。报告“相当低/低”生活水平的中风组比例从 8%增加到 28%,“刚好/不足够”收入从 35%增加到 61%,而损伤组仅从 5%增加到 12%和 33%-44%。12 个月时,报告生活水平低和收入不足的几率,损伤组显著低于中风组。尽管有与收入相关的赔偿(收入的 80%),但与中风组相比,损伤组重返工作岗位的几率更大(调整后的优势比为 3.1;95%可信区间为 1.7-5.6)。

结论

这些发现支持以下结论,即 ACC 为受伤者提供的与收入相关的赔偿和康复支持,在很大程度上防止了贫困和健康状况恶化的恶性循环。它似乎也促进了重返工作岗位,尽管不能排除残余混杂因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验