• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基层医疗中的触诊:医生和患者感知的定性研究。

Touch in primary care consultations: qualitative investigation of doctors' and patients' perceptions.

机构信息

Manchester Medical School, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

出版信息

Br J Gen Pract. 2013 Apr;63(609):e283-90. doi: 10.3399/bjgp13X665251.

DOI:10.3399/bjgp13X665251
PMID:23540485
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3609476/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Good communication skills are integral to successful doctor-patient relationships. Communication may be verbal or non-verbal, and touch is a significant component, which has received little attention in the primary care literature. Touch may be procedural (part of a clinical task) or expressive (contact unrelated to a procedure/examination).

AIM

To explore GPs' and patients' experiences of using touch in consultations.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Qualitative study in urban and semi-rural areas of north-west England.

METHOD

Participating GPs recruited registered patients with whom they felt they had an ongoing relationship. Data were collected by semi-structured interviews and subjected to constant comparative qualitative analysis.

RESULTS

All participants described the importance of verbal and non-verbal communication in developing relationships. Expressive touch was suggested to improve communication quality by most GPs and all patients. GPs reported a lower threshold for using touch with older patients or those who were bereaved, and with patients of the same sex as themselves. All patient responders felt touch on the hand or forearm was appropriate. GPs described limits to using touch, with some responders rarely using anything other than procedural touch. In contrast, most patient responders believed expressive touch was acceptable, especially in situations of distress. All GP responders feared misinterpretation in their use of touch, but patients were keen that these concerns should not prevent doctors using expressive touch in consultations.

CONCLUSION

Expressive touch improves interactions between GPs and patients. Increased educational emphasis on the conscious use of expressive touch would enhance clinical communication and, hence, perhaps patient wellbeing and care.

摘要

背景

良好的沟通技巧是成功医患关系的重要组成部分。沟通可以是口头的或非口头的,而触摸是一个重要的组成部分,但在初级保健文献中却很少受到关注。触摸可能是程序性的(临床任务的一部分),也可能是表达性的(与程序/检查无关的接触)。

目的

探索全科医生和患者在咨询中使用触摸的体验。

设计和设置

在英格兰西北部的城市和半农村地区进行定性研究。

方法

参与的全科医生招募了他们认为与他们有持续关系的注册患者。通过半结构化访谈收集数据,并进行持续比较的定性分析。

结果

所有参与者都描述了口头和非言语沟通在建立关系中的重要性。表达性触摸被大多数全科医生和所有患者认为可以提高沟通质量。全科医生报告说,他们更倾向于对老年患者或丧偶患者以及与自己性别相同的患者使用触摸。所有患者受访者都认为触摸手或前臂是合适的。全科医生描述了使用触摸的限制,一些回应者很少使用除程序性触摸以外的任何触摸。相比之下,大多数患者受访者认为表达性触摸是可以接受的,尤其是在痛苦的情况下。所有全科医生回应者都担心他们使用触摸会被误解,但患者希望医生在咨询中不要因为这些担忧而避免使用表达性触摸。

结论

表达性触摸可以改善全科医生和患者之间的互动。在有意识地使用表达性触摸方面增加教育重点将增强临床沟通,从而提高患者的幸福感和护理水平。

相似文献

1
Touch in primary care consultations: qualitative investigation of doctors' and patients' perceptions.基层医疗中的触诊:医生和患者感知的定性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2013 Apr;63(609):e283-90. doi: 10.3399/bjgp13X665251.
2
Holding relationships in primary care: a qualitative exploration of doctors' and patients' perceptions.基层医疗中的医患关系:对医生和患者认知的定性探索。
Br J Gen Pract. 2011 Aug;61(589):e484-91. doi: 10.3399/bjgp11X588457.
3
Doctors' perceptions of personal boundaries to primary care interactions: a qualitative investigation.医生对初级保健互动中个人边界的认知:一项定性研究。
Commun Med. 2009;6(2):109-16.
4
GPs' perspectives of type 2 diabetes patients' adherence to treatment: A qualitative analysis of barriers and solutions.全科医生对2型糖尿病患者治疗依从性的看法:障碍与解决方案的定性分析
BMC Fam Pract. 2005 May 12;6(1):20. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-6-20.
5
GPs' experiences of children with anxiety disorders in primary care: a qualitative study.全科医生在初级保健中对焦虑障碍儿童的体验:一项定性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2017 Dec;67(665):e888-e898. doi: 10.3399/bjgp17X693473. Epub 2017 Oct 23.
6
How do patients and general practitioners in Denmark perceive the communicative advantages and disadvantages of access via email consultations? A media-theoretical qualitative study.丹麦的患者和全科医生如何看待通过电子邮件咨询的沟通优势和劣势?一项基于媒体理论的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 26;10(10):e039442. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039442.
7
Placebos in primary care? a nominal group study explicating UK GP and patient views of six theoretically plausible models of placebo practice.初级保健中的安慰剂?一项名义群体研究阐释了英国全科医生和患者对六种理论上合理的安慰剂实践模式的看法。
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 18;10(2):e032524. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032524.
8
Does burnout among doctors affect their involvement in patients' mental health problems? A study of videotaped consultations.医生的职业倦怠是否会影响他们对患者心理健康问题的关注?一项关于录像会诊的研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2009 Aug 26;10:60. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-10-60.
9
Changes in general practitioners' sensitivity to patients' distress in low back pain consultations.全科医生在腰痛诊疗中对患者痛苦敏感度的变化。
Patient Educ Couns. 2015 Oct;98(10):1207-13. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.07.027. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
10
Improving GP communication in consultations on medically unexplained symptoms: a qualitative interview study with patients in primary care.改善全科医生在对无法解释的医学症状进行咨询时的沟通:一项对初级保健患者的定性访谈研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2017 Oct;67(663):e716-e723. doi: 10.3399/bjgp17X692537. Epub 2017 Aug 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Touch, communication and affect: a systematic review on the use of touch in healthcare professions.触摸、沟通与情感:关于医疗行业中触摸运用的系统综述
Syst Rev. 2025 Feb 14;14(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s13643-025-02769-4.
2
Continuity within a community integrated palliative care model and the influence of remote and digital approaches to care: a qualitative interview study.社区综合姑息治疗模式中的连续性以及远程和数字护理方法的影响:一项定性访谈研究
BJGP Open. 2025 Apr 24;9(1). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0126. Print 2025 Apr.
3
"Like not having an arm": a qualitative study of the impact of visitor restrictions on cancer care during the COVID-19 pandemic.“就像没有胳膊一样”:COVID-19 大流行期间访客限制对癌症护理影响的定性研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Apr 16;32(5):288. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08473-8.
4
Patients' recommendations to improve help-seeking for vaginismus: a qualitative study.患者对改善阴道痉挛求治的建议:一项定性研究。
BMC Womens Health. 2024 Mar 30;24(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s12905-024-03026-x.
5
Intercorporeal Formations in Pediatric Dental Encounters With Patients Showing Distress: The Intertwine of Controlling and Comforting Touch.儿科牙科诊疗中与表现出痛苦的患者之间的体内形成:控制与安慰性触摸的交织
Qual Health Res. 2024 Mar;34(4):323-339. doi: 10.1177/10497323231211451. Epub 2023 Nov 20.
6
Patients' experiences of being touched by their general practitioner: a qualitative study.患者对全科医生触诊体验的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 31;13(7):e071701. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-071701.
7
The Nurses' Perception of Expressive Touch: An Integrative Review.护士对表达性触摸的认知:一项综合综述。
J Caring Sci. 2023 Feb 7;12(1):4-13. doi: 10.34172/jcs.2023.31903. eCollection 2023 Feb.
8
Effect of multimodal comprehensive communication skills training with video analysis by artificial intelligence for physicians on acute geriatric care: a mixed-methods study.多模态综合沟通技能培训与人工智能视频分析对急性老年病治疗的影响:一项混合方法研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 3;13(3):e065477. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065477.
9
Effects of COVID-19 on Older Adults: Physical, Mental, Emotional, Social, and Financial Problems Seen and Unseen.新冠病毒肺炎对老年人的影响:已见与未见的身体、心理、情感、社交及财务问题
Cureus. 2022 Sep 23;14(9):e29493. doi: 10.7759/cureus.29493. eCollection 2022 Sep.
10
Differences between experimental and placebo arms in manual therapy trials: a methodological review.手法治疗试验中实验组与安慰剂组之间的差异:方法学综述。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Aug 8;22(1):219. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01704-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Helping through touch: The embodiment of caring.以触相助:关怀的体现。
J Relig Health. 1989 Dec;28(4):299-322. doi: 10.1007/BF00986067.
2
Touch in the consultation.诊疗中的接触。
Br J Gen Pract. 2012 Mar;62(596):147-8. doi: 10.3399/bjgp12X630133.
3
Holding relationships in primary care: a qualitative exploration of doctors' and patients' perceptions.基层医疗中的医患关系:对医生和患者认知的定性探索。
Br J Gen Pract. 2011 Aug;61(589):e484-91. doi: 10.3399/bjgp11X588457.
4
Doctors' perceptions of personal boundaries to primary care interactions: a qualitative investigation.医生对初级保健互动中个人边界的认知:一项定性研究。
Commun Med. 2009;6(2):109-16.
5
Patients' perceptions of GP non-verbal communication: a qualitative study.患者对全科医生非言语沟通的感知:一项定性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2010 Feb;60(571):83-7. doi: 10.3399/bjgp10X483111.
6
A conceptual model of intentional comfort touch.一种有意舒适触摸的概念模型。
J Holist Nurs. 2009 Jun;27(2):127-35. doi: 10.1177/0898010109333337.
7
UK consensus statement on the content of communication curricula in undergraduate medical education.英国本科医学教育中沟通课程内容的共识声明。
Med Educ. 2008 Nov;42(11):1100-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03137.x. Epub 2008 Aug 21.
8
The expression of emotion through nonverbal behavior in medical visits. Mechanisms and outcomes.医疗就诊中通过非语言行为表达情感。机制与结果。
J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Jan;21 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S28-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00306.x.
9
Qualitative research and the problem of judgement: lessons from interviewing fellow professionals.定性研究与判断问题:来自对同行专业人士访谈的经验教训
Fam Pract. 2002 Jun;19(3):285-9. doi: 10.1093/fampra/19.3.285.
10
Empathy is important for enablement.同理心对于赋能而言至关重要。
BMJ. 2001 Apr 7;322(7290):865.