• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Sealants and dental caries: insight into dentists' behaviors regarding implementation of clinical practice recommendations.窝沟封闭剂和龋齿:洞察牙医在实施临床实践建议方面的行为。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2013 Apr;144(4):e24-30. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2013.0139.
2
Sealants and dental caries: dentists' perspectives on evidence-based recommendations.窝沟封闭剂和龋齿:基于循证建议的牙医观点。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2011 Sep;142(9):1033-40. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2011.0324.
3
Barriers to sealant guideline implementation within a multi-site managed care dental practice.多地点管理式医疗牙科诊所中封闭剂指南实施的障碍
BMC Oral Health. 2018 Feb 2;18(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12903-018-0480-z.
4
Sealants and caries.窝沟封闭剂与龋齿
J Am Dent Assoc. 2013 Jul;144(7):767-8. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2013.0182.
5
Authors' response.作者回复。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2013 Jul;144(7):768, 770. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2013.0183.
6
Restorative treatment thresholds for occlusal primary caries among dentists in the dental practice-based research network.基于实践的口腔研究网络中牙医对咬合面原发性龋齿的修复治疗阈值。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2010 Feb;141(2):171-84. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2010.0136.
7
Evidence-practice gap for dental sealant application: results from a dental practice-based research network in Japan.牙科密封剂应用中的证据与实践差距:来自日本一个基于牙科实践的研究网络的结果。
Int Dent J. 2016 Dec;66(6):330-336. doi: 10.1111/idj.12252. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
8
Attitudes, knowledge and utilization of fissure sealants among Greek dentists: a national survey.希腊牙医对窝沟封闭剂的态度、知识及使用情况:一项全国性调查。
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2010 Dec;11(6):287-93. doi: 10.1007/BF03262765.
9
Differences in male and female dentists' practice patterns regarding diagnosis and treatment of dental caries: findings from The Dental Practice-Based Research Network.男性和女性牙医在诊断和治疗龋齿方面的实践模式差异:来自牙科实践基础研究网络的研究结果。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2011 Apr;142(4):429-40. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2011.0199.
10
Evidence-based clinical practice guideline for the use of pit-and-fissure sealants: A report of the American Dental Association and the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry.窝沟封闭剂使用的循证临床实践指南:美国牙科协会和美国儿科学会报告
J Am Dent Assoc. 2016 Aug;147(8):672-682.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2016.06.001.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors associated with positive perceptions of sealant use on permanent molars among Brazilian dentists.巴西牙医对恒牙使用窝沟封闭剂的积极认知相关因素。
Braz Oral Res. 2025 Jun 2;39:e054. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2025.vol39.054. eCollection 2025.
2
Results from a cluster-randomized, stepped-wedge trial testing a deliberative engagement intervention to increase guideline adherence among U.S. oral health providers.一项整群随机阶梯楔形试验的结果,该试验测试了一种促进参与的干预措施,以提高美国口腔健康提供者对指南的依从性。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 25;15(1):18180. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-03236-9.
3
Adoption and Effect of Sealants for Occlusal Noncavitated Caries in a Large Dental Network in the USA.美国一个大型牙科网络中窝沟封闭剂用于咬合面非龋洞性龋的应用及效果
Caries Res. 2025;59(1):11-21. doi: 10.1159/000540884. Epub 2024 Aug 16.
4
Improvements in appropriate placement of dental sealants after implementation of a clinical decision support system.临床决策支持系统实施后,牙面窝沟封闭剂放置位置的改善。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2024 May;155(5):409-416. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2024.02.009. Epub 2024 Apr 6.
5
New dental graduates transition into UK professional practice; a longitudinal study of changes in perceptions and behaviours through the lens of evidence-based dentistry.新牙科毕业生在英国进入专业实践;以循证牙科为视角,通过纵向研究来了解观念和行为的变化。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Feb 26;24(1):195. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05182-y.
6
Dissemination and implementation research for oral and craniofacial health: Background, a review of literature and future directions.口腔和颅面健康的传播和实施研究:背景、文献回顾和未来方向。
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2023 Feb;51(1):119-132. doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12841. Epub 2023 Feb 6.
7
Reframing perceptions in operative dentistry relating evidence-based dentistry and clinical decision making: a cross-sectional study among Jordanian dentists.重新构建与循证牙科和临床决策相关的口腔手术中认知:约旦牙医的横断面研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Dec 24;22(1):637. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02641-0.
8
The Assessment of Sealants' Effectiveness in Arresting Non-Cavitated Caries Lesion-A 24-Month Follow-Up.窝沟封闭剂预防非龋性龋损效果的评估——24个月随访
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Aug 30;10(9):1651. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10091651.
9
Fissure sealants or fluoride varnish? Factors associated with choice of management method for occlusal caries in Public Dental Service in Norway.窝沟封闭剂还是氟化物涂料?挪威公共牙科服务中选择窝沟龋管理方法的相关因素。
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2022 Jun;23(3):455-464. doi: 10.1007/s40368-022-00708-8. Epub 2022 Apr 13.
10
BigMouth: development and maintenance of a successful dental data repository.大嘴:成功的牙科数据存储库的开发和维护。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Mar 15;29(4):701-706. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac001.

本文引用的文献

1
The changing standard of care.不断变化的护理标准。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2012 May;143(5):434-7. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2012.0190.
2
More about sealants.更多关于封闭剂的内容。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2012 Mar;143(3):212; author reply 212, 214. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2012.0133.
3
Sealants and EBD.窝沟封闭剂与预防性树脂充填术
J Am Dent Assoc. 2012 Mar;143(3):210, 212; author reply 212, 214. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2012.0132.
4
Sealants and dental caries: dentists' perspectives on evidence-based recommendations.窝沟封闭剂和龋齿:基于循证建议的牙医观点。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2011 Sep;142(9):1033-40. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2011.0324.
5
Caries risk assessment/treatment programs in U.S. dental schools: an eleven-year follow-up.美国牙科学院龋病风险评估/治疗方案:十一年随访。
J Dent Educ. 2011 Jan;75(1):62-7.
6
Knowledge may not be the best target for strategies to influence evidence-based practice: using psychological models to understand RCT effects.知识可能不是影响循证实践策略的最佳目标:运用心理学模型理解随机对照试验的效果。
Int J Behav Med. 2009;16(3):287-93. doi: 10.1007/s12529-008-9017-1. Epub 2009 Feb 20.
7
Evidence-based clinical recommendations for the use of pit-and-fissure sealants: a report of the American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs.窝沟封闭剂使用的循证临床建议:美国牙科协会科学事务委员会报告
J Am Dent Assoc. 2008 Mar;139(3):257-68. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0155.
8
Bridging the gap in caries management between research and practice through education: the Indiana University experience.通过教育弥合龋齿管理研究与实践之间的差距:印第安纳大学的经验。
J Dent Educ. 2007 May;71(5):579-91.
9
Applying psychological theory to evidence-based clinical practice: identifying factors predictive of taking intra-oral radiographs.将心理学理论应用于循证临床实践:识别口腔内X光片拍摄的预测因素。
Soc Sci Med. 2006 Oct;63(7):1889-99. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.04.005. Epub 2006 Jul 14.
10
Enhancing the use of clinical guidelines: a social norms perspective.从社会规范视角看加强临床指南的应用
J Am Coll Surg. 2006 May;202(5):826-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.03.011.

窝沟封闭剂和龋齿:洞察牙医在实施临床实践建议方面的行为。

Sealants and dental caries: insight into dentists' behaviors regarding implementation of clinical practice recommendations.

机构信息

School of Dental Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, 440 Salk Hall, 3501 Terrace St., Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA.

出版信息

J Am Dent Assoc. 2013 Apr;144(4):e24-30. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2013.0139.

DOI:10.14219/jada.archive.2013.0139
PMID:23543700
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3676186/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The authors conducted a qualitative study of private-practice dentists in their offices by using vignette-based interviews to assess barriers to the use of evidence-based clinical recommendations in the treatment of noncavitated carious lesions.

METHODS

The authors recruited 22 dentists as a convenience sample and presented them with two patient vignettes involving noncavitated carious lesions. Interviewers asked participants to articulate their thought processes as they described treatment recommendations. Participants compared their treatment plans with the American Dental Association's recommendations for sealing noncavitated carious lesions, and they described barriers to implementing these recommendations in their practices. The authors recorded and transcribed the sessions for accuracy and themes.

RESULTS

Personal clinical experience emerged as the determining factor in dentists' treatment decisions regarding noncavitated carious lesions. Additional factors were lack of reimbursement and mistrust of the recommendations. The authors found that knowledge of the recommendations did not lead to their adoption when the recommendation was incongruent with the dentist's personal experience.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors found that ingrained practice behavior based on personal clinical experience that differed substantially from evidence-based recommendations resulted in a rejection of these recommendations.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

Attempts to improve the adoption of evidence-based practice must involve more than simple dissemination of information to achieve a balance between personal clinical experience and scientific evidence.

摘要

背景

作者通过基于情景的访谈,在私人执业牙医的办公室中进行了一项定性研究,以评估在治疗非龋性窝沟病变时采用基于证据的临床推荐的障碍。

方法

作者招募了 22 名牙医作为便利样本,并向他们展示了两个涉及非龋性窝沟病变的患者情景。访谈者要求参与者在描述治疗建议时阐明他们的思维过程。参与者将他们的治疗计划与美国牙科协会对非龋性窝沟病变密封的建议进行了比较,并描述了在实践中实施这些建议的障碍。作者为了准确性和主题记录并转录了会议。

结果

个人临床经验成为牙医对非龋性窝沟病变治疗决策的决定性因素。其他因素是缺乏报销和对建议的不信任。作者发现,当建议与牙医的个人经验不一致时,即使了解这些建议,也不会导致其被采用。

结论

作者发现,基于与基于证据的建议大不相同的个人临床经验的根深蒂固的实践行为导致了对这些建议的拒绝。

实际意义

为了在个人临床经验和科学证据之间取得平衡,提高采用基于证据的实践的尝试必须不仅仅涉及简单的信息传播。