Gross Bradley A, Rosalind Lai Pui Man, Frerichs Kai U, Du Rose
Department of Neurological Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Department of Neurological Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
World Neurosurg. 2014 Dec;82(6):1127-30. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2013.03.072. Epub 2013 Mar 30.
Recent evidence has suggested a potential beneficial effect of aspirin on the risk of aneurysm rupture. This benefit must be weighed against its potential adverse effects as an antiplatelet agent in the setting of acute aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH).
A total of 747 consecutive patients with cerebral aneurysms were reviewed, comparing demographics, aneurysm features, presenting clinical and radiographic grades, vasospasm, and outcome at 1 year between patients with aneurysmal SAH taking aspirin on presentation and those who were not.
The rate of hemorrhagic presentation was significantly greater in patients not taking aspirin (40% vs. 28%; P = 0.016). Among 274 patients presenting with aneurysmal SAH, there was no significant difference in presenting clinical (Hunt and Hess) and radiographic (Fisher) grade between patients taking aspirin and those who were not. There was also no significant difference in the rate of subsequent angiographic and delayed cerebral ischemia. Multivariate analysis of outcome at 1 year found only increasing age (odds ratio [OR] 1.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.12), Hunt and Hess grade (OR 3.01, 95% CI 1.81-5.03), and associated hypertension (OR 3.30, 95% CI 1.39-7.81) to be statistically significant risk factors for poor outcome (death or dependence), whereas aspirin use was not associated with poor outcome (OR 1.19, 95% CI 0.35-4.09; P = 0.78).
In the present study, patients taking aspirin had a lower rate of hemorrhagic presentation. In addition, taking aspirin did not adversely impact presenting clinical grade or radiographic grade, vasospasm, and outcome in the setting of aneurysmal SAH.
近期证据表明阿司匹林对动脉瘤破裂风险可能具有有益作用。在急性动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH)的情况下,必须权衡这种益处与其作为抗血小板药物的潜在不良反应。
回顾了总共747例连续性脑动脉瘤患者,比较了动脉瘤性SAH患者就诊时服用阿司匹林和未服用阿司匹林患者的人口统计学、动脉瘤特征、临床表现和影像学分级、血管痉挛情况以及1年时的预后。
未服用阿司匹林的患者出血表现率显著更高(40%对28%;P = 0.016)。在274例表现为动脉瘤性SAH的患者中,服用阿司匹林和未服用阿司匹林的患者在临床表现(Hunt和Hess分级)和影像学(Fisher分级)分级方面无显著差异。后续血管造影和迟发性脑缺血发生率也无显著差异。对1年时的预后进行多因素分析发现,只有年龄增加(优势比[OR] 1.07,95%置信区间[CI] 1.04 - 1.12)、Hunt和Hess分级(OR 3.01,95% CI 1.81 - 5.03)以及合并高血压(OR 3.30,95% CI 1.39 - 7.81)是预后不良(死亡或依赖)的统计学显著危险因素,而使用阿司匹林与预后不良无关(OR 1.19,95% CI 0.35 - 4.09;P = 0.78)。
在本研究中,服用阿司匹林的患者出血表现率较低。此外,在动脉瘤性SAH的情况下,服用阿司匹林对临床表现分级、影像学分级、血管痉挛和预后没有不利影响。