Suppr超能文献

临终关怀中的循证实践:定性研究是否比定量研究更合适?

Evidence-based practice in hospice: is qualitative more appropriate than quantitative?

作者信息

Jones Brian W

机构信息

St. Elizabeth Healthcare, Edgewood, KY 41017, USA.

出版信息

Home Healthc Nurse. 2013 Apr;31(4):184-8. doi: 10.1097/NHH.0b013e3182885ec4.

Abstract

Evidence-based practice has become the accepted phrase relative to healthcare quality and outcomes. Hospice providers have begun to express an interest in applying evidence to practice. Evidence-based practice, with its tiers of evidence, ranks quantitative research methods at the top. However, there is concern that applying evidence-based practice to a subjective concept like pain and suffering may be problematic. A more balanced approach to quality outcomes in hospice care may need to involve patient experience and qualitative research.

摘要

循证实践已成为与医疗质量和结果相关的公认术语。临终关怀提供者已开始对将证据应用于实践表现出兴趣。循证实践及其证据层级将定量研究方法列为最高等级。然而,有人担心将循证实践应用于诸如疼痛和痛苦这样的主观概念可能会有问题。在临终关怀中实现更平衡的质量结果方法可能需要纳入患者体验和定性研究。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验